Is tech really a meritocracy?

>think why pajeet & chink, and nerd flooding this field
EVERY Indian is studying engineering/tech because they have no other options. Poor people are instilled at a young age to aim for the highest jobs possible, and tech happens to be the most accessible to them. It has nothing to do with being smart.

I would say it's more a meritocracy than other high paid white collar work.

Where else can I get 6 figures remotely by lying about the nature of my experience? I do the job well, I'm an asset to the team, I'm very good at communicating for being autistic, and it allows me to do what I'm good at, slack off during work hours some, and turn it the fuck off and leave at the end of the day.

People that whine about the work are faggots that have never done manual labor, the keys are WFH and Romanian deadlifts at LEAST for fitness, assuming you get your 10k steps in.

The merit was in bullshitting the HR wordfilter and getting the right technical interview. The job I was just leet enough to be good at

i suppose, to an extent. one could theoretically learn computer science without actually touching a computer. that said, would they be better off than someone who had the opportunity to? im not sure. in the end its an issue of feminism, and trying to get everyone to parity where its not just who you know or what you have or really even what you know necessarily.

proud of you, Any Forumsays