The one question vegans will NEVER ANSWER

This is specifically aimed at retards who genuinely believe humans aren't carnivores, not vegans who admit their lifestyle is only remotely possible thanks to industrial society and a whole industry of supplements.

Let's say you're a man from 100,000 years ago, prior to when agriculture was invented.
No plants are domesticated. All you can do is harvest. You're vegan so you won't hunt, nor scavenge eggs, nor capture an animal to milk it.
Your wife just gave birth and is breastfeeding.
How do you, as a vegan man, harvest enough plants, DAILY, ALL YEAR ROUND, so that you reach around 5000 kcal a day to feed your breastfeeding wife and yourself?

Attached: file.png (793x644, 497.57K)

is breastfeeding vegan?

Yes, don't try to derail the thread.

>Arguing with logic against emotional beliefs
Ngmi

drinking milk isnt vegan faggot

>genuinely believe humans aren't carnivores
because we aren't
we're omnivores

also how fat is your wife if she consumes 5000kcal/day?

>t. vegan trying to derail the thread
drinking your consenting mother's milk is vegan, and as I can see you're avoiding the question
you consume calories too retard, 5000 kcal is your wife + you
>omnivore
meme term for hypo/mesocarnivore.

vegan logic relies on one simple distinction: humans are not mere animals.
you see, a vegan does not consume animal products, because environmentally, and ethically, they consider it to be immoral. but humans are not mere animals, therefore human breastmilk is permissible to feed a vegan baby.

I dislike veganism as much as the next person, but this guy can't be trusted

>>genuinely believe humans aren't carnivores
>because we aren't
>we're omnivores
this
Why does everything have to be so black and white with you aspie fucks?

omnivore is a made up term for meso/hypocarnivore
in a natural setting vegans (and even vegetarians desu, good luck harvesting enough eggs) would starve to death due do the lack of availability of calories and protein from plants.
therefore humans evolved to need meat, and since humans need to eat meat, they're carnivores. never said they were hypercarnivores like lions.

>meme term for hypo/mesocarnivore.
>omnivore is a made up term for meso/hypocarnivore
wrong

if it’s was alive in that time i wouldn’t be vegan. but i’m alive today.

HUMANS AREN'T CARNIVORES
HUMANS ARE OMNIVORES
we eat everything we can digest

>we eat everything we can digest
like literally any living organism you daft cunt : nice argument retard

Not a vegan but no, it's not "humans aren't animals" it's "humans can consent." Under the vegan thought process no animal can consent to being killed and no animal can consent to the recurring cycle of pregnancy, having their offspring taken young, and getting strapped to machines to be milked. Because no animal product can be produced without harm and/or coercion to animals, animal products would be unethical to consume or use. Human milk is fine because the human can consent to it; even then if a mother doesn't want to breastfeed and chooses to use formula a vegan would say requiring her breast milk would become unethical because it would be without consent from a being capable of consent.

This premise is retarded. No one was vegan or vegetarian by then, except incidentally for a given meal or timespan due to failed hunting/scavenging.
Whether or not someone should be vegan in the 21st century is entirely unrelated to the viability of a vegan diet and lifestyle of prehistoric humans.

Imagine you're 100,000 years ago and a massive faggot. How do you post on Any Forums?

but we didn't evolve to _need_ meat. you can live perfectly fine without it
you're just looking for arguments to validate your original argument about some hypothetical scenario which is set way in the past
which, btw has nothing to do with veganism and multiple people here have already pointed that out to you

I see reading comprehension isn't your thing.
>This is specifically aimed at retards who genuinely believe humans aren't carnivores.
My point is, humans are carnivores (and not hypercarnivores, never said such a thing), since that in a natural setting, we -cannot- live without meat. The only aspect that allows you to live (and certainly not thrive, you will have a lot of deficiencies either way) as a vegan is industrial society and very modern supplements that have nothing to do with the way we've evolved.
Hell, agriculture is 10,000 years old. Barely a speck in our evolutional timeline.

No animal that could consent would ever consent to being killed and eaten except some super fucked up sexual violence victims (human) the distinction really is about being human. Predatory wolves or bears are fine because they don't know better, but were not like them. We are above. We should resist meat.
It's fuckin pathetic.
Also the concept that stealing a cows milk is rape is hysterical. The domestic cow is not a wild animal. They exist primarily for human consumption.

>but we didn't evolve to _need_ meat. you can live perfectly fine without it
fuck you, fuck your cult and your lack of basic biology