The fact that the Greeks knew how to accurately model this physique 2000 years before the invention of gear is proof that this physique is attainable natty.
The fact that the Greeks knew how to accurately model this physique 2000 years before the invention of gear is proof...
they dont want you to know
Proof enough for me 2hrnp
Your logic is seriously flawed
Explain
this is what the ancient knowledge contains. being Any Forums and always in a based pose while women worship you and want to receive your seed. of course this is what they fear the most
No
Why can't they use a model that is lean with those muscles and just change the proportions of the model?
Could you not make a statue of a slim woman with huuuug titties?
Checked
>slim woman with huuuug titties?
Naturally achievable too, might be rare but they exist.
The statue of Hercules is infamous for the fact that it has muscles that do not exist on the human body.
Pic related is Eugen Sandow trying to recreate the statue with his own body. PEDs weren't around back then so this is as close as a natty can get (which is still very impressive).
I forgot the picture.
This picture exists, therefore is an attainable standard. How else could this image be created if we hadn't known of men so shredded and large?
Heroes could not have possibly been exaggerated through artistic mediums to bring greater gravitas to their legends, right?
That's a statue of Hercules, the strongest man alive, literally a demi-god. They're not going to portray him with the physique of a normal person they are going to massively exaggerate his size way beyond what a mortal person could look like.
>Greeks
fucking brainlet
You really don't think it's possible they made statues bigger than the human limits at the time? Just like how we like drawing and creating characters bigger than human limits, they probably did too.
someone made this therefore it’s real
ignore demoralization trannies
Something isn't true just because you want it to be true.
That's woman logic.
>be me
>visit a museum displaying ancient art
>there's a statue of a satyr with goat legs and a 1,4 m (my estimate) cock
What can I learn from this?
get back in your bucket
>Thinking with your emotions
ngmi
That's really interesting. The Victorian lifting scene sounds intense without any roids.
No, because I like fat girls.
>que venus of willendorf
If it exists where are all of the people that look like this? There are 7 billion people on earth and not one of them looks like this
nature truly is phenomenal
The fact that the Greeks knew how to accurately model this cock 2000 years
I guess this means the Hulk is realistic too, OP.
>he's literally me
I’m interested to see bunnyeventhoughsbeislike4timesinweightanditisclearlynotstoppinghimatall2.jpg
Sandow gets mogged by modern natties that tower over his 5"7 body. He's not the indication of the so called "natty limit"
>The Farnese Hercules (Italian: Ercole Farnese) is an ancient statue of Hercules, probably an enlarged copy made in the early third century AD and signed by Glykon, who is otherwise unknown; the name is Greek but he may have worked in Rome.[1] Like many other Ancient Roman sculptures it is a copy or version of a much older Greek original that was well known, in this case a bronze by Lysippos (or one of his circle) that would have been made in the fourth century BC.[2] This original survived for over 1500 years until it was melted down by Crusaders in 1205 during the Sack of Constantinople. The enlarged copy was made for the Baths of Caracalla in Rome (dedicated in 216 AD), where the statue was recovered in 1546,[3] and is now in the Museo Archeologico Nazionale in Naples.
Also the 4th crusaders where the niggers of Europe
my ancestor