Bloodborne is overrated

Demon Souls has better visual design.
Dark Souls 1 has better gameplay.
Dark Souls 2 has better lore.
Dark Souls 3 has better bosses.
Sekiro has better combat.
Elden Ring has better exploration.

Attached: 1661695112689914.png (506x648, 678.89K)

Bloodborne is a compact, quite polished experience with great exploration, fun builds, surprisingly varied environments, enjoyable combat, amazing music, and a cool aesthetic.
It's essentially a jack-of-all-trades because it got everything right. It didn't excel in any particular area (DS1 has its world design, DS2 has the pvp, DeS has the soul, etc), but it's the best game overall.

>fun builds
>varied environments
I agree with everything you've said but not this, it does have fun weapons and beautiful environments though.

The game has surprisingly varied environments for what it is. I expected it all to be le gothic city stuff but it really wasn't.

Wrong.

>fun builds
with what? one of the 20 cosmetic armor sets? 2 of the 6 pistols that actually work? 4 of the 10 weapons? what fucking builds???

>Bloodborne is overrated
yes
>Demon Souls has better visual design.
no
>Dark Souls 1 has better gameplay.
no
>Dark Souls 2 has better lore.
no
>Dark Souls 3 has better bosses.
yes
>Sekiro has better combat.
Sekiro is better in everything
>Elden Ring has better exploration.
yes

All bloodborne has going for it is the art style

>Demon Souls has better visual design.
No
>Dark Souls 1 has better gameplay.
No
>Dark Souls 2 has better lore.
Hell no
>Dark Souls 3 has better bosses.
No
>Sekiro has better combat.
Yes
>Elden Ring has better exploration.
No

Le gothic city makes up a pretty big fraction of the game and it has the least varied environments out of all From Software titles except maybe Sekiro.