How does Any Forums feel about in-depth videogame analysis?
huh
what is the top
Bunch of teenagers with barely any understanding of themselves who try to make "thought" out videos over complicating their simplistic and generic views and getting a bunch of people to agree with them because they feel like they're the underdogs. Or if they're popular, (excluding MatthewMatosis) than a bunch of people who read wikipedia articles and try to clickbait endlessly.
No i can hardly imagine a video being more then 1 hour and a half at max
>mobile
K Y S
During WW2, it took Germany one hour less than the length of this video to conquer Denmark.
Is this one of those videos where he actually looks over the entire Fallout franchise, yet the video is oddly specifically titled "New Vegas" anyway?
Because if so I could understand 7 hours. But if not, then what the fuck is he covering?
It's literally just a recap of the gameplay and plot, even the 'good' ones like MatthewMatosis. YouTubers can never create, just grift off already existing media.
All these games have already been analyzed to death by video essays from a decade ago. I was watching a newish Half-Life essay by some zoomer the other day and I realized: I already know all this. All of the "little-known" details and bits of lore or development history have already been covered a thousand times over.
Joke's on me for watching a video essay I guess, but I don't see how these zoomers can self-seriously rehash material that is already available from a hundred other videos hosted on the same platform.
Wait till you learn about the news industry.