Notjustbikes is a Canadian who moved to the Netherlands after having kids. He has changed my views on urban planning entirely and inspired me to visit the Netherlands. I hope more cities follows your country's example
Notjustbikes is a Canadian who moved to the Netherlands after having kids...
You cannot have walkable cities when you live with niggers
this, cities don't have to be bad
This is my urban plan.
All this shilling for "walkable cities" is no different from the articles telling us that we should be come a nation of renters, and that not owning a home is a good thing. This is no different from articles trying to convince us that meat should be a "sometimes" treat and not a dietary staple.
Stop trying to convince us to give up our middle class lifestyle. Fuck your neofeudalism. Fuck the destruction of the middle class.
I think it's moreso down to preference. If you're a person who appreciates the space you get from living in a single family home with a big lawn then cities aren't for you. But the benefits of being able to access basic things like a grocery store, school, and parks by walking instead of driving a car everywhere are there.
Also the density (not some nutzo apartment complex thing, something like picrel seems fine to me) helps with housing prices not being assfucked by Blackrock. But like the other user said, niggers kind of ruin a lot of that since they can take advantage of those prices and accessibility too.
So live in a city without niggers.
He's right but forgets to mention the main downside of his view: Niggers and other Shitskins.
>If you're a person who appreciates the space you get from living in a single family home with a big lawn then cities aren't for you.
Wrong. It's not up to you. People get to have single family homes in big lawns in cities. You have no say in the matter.
You will let the immigrant build a shack shop in your front yard and you will be happy
Don't man. It truly is mainly boring and there are a million better places to go to.
This guy is right, it's illegal to build anything but single family homes in 90% of USA and Canada. You have 2 options, either some condo high rise tower or single family home. No other options.
Like user saysOur country is boring, divided and expensive. Plus we don't want your kind here.
Yeah, about that. They move to prosperous cities when there are jobs available, except the north east. For whatever reason it has remained 99 percent white. My city elected a liberal and africans started coming in after getting hired by the local government so they won't be poor.
If they have a job, they ain't a nigger in the first place. Not having a job is pretty much the basic requirement for a nigger. If they ain't on welfare or their job doesn't involve firearms and drugs, something is wrong with the picture you're painting.
Nah, the smart cities push is the neofeudalists. The walkable push is a distraction since the various neofeudalists would never be able to agree on it, at least not in North America. The origins of the problem are the root of how cities are planned, how cities are developed, and how that development is financed. There are far too many people far too comfy with the ways their subculture works and makes money to see the foundational changes necessary.
All that movement seems to be managing so far is to close off a handful of streets the laptop class imagines themselves sitting outside for a latte in, and to paint bike lanes or worse shared use lanes on the road. These changes are relatively inoffensive to the calcified power structures and are also pretty much entirely useless. Notjustbikes for example goes into how that style of bike lane is horrible and no substitute at all for the real thing.
You'd need someone with the political power and will and the courage to try to do the right thing to have any hope of seeing real improvements. This is exactly what our political systems is designed to suppress. There is endless paperwork and policy governing things like potential $20 benefits possibly going to a low level government worker when they shouldn't. This same red tape ties up the potential of doing the right thing and drags it into a series of committees where it inevitably dies. Or it acts as a chilling effect where the employee knows that option A will save the government hundreds of thousands but it also puts their continued employment in jeopardy.
Meanwhile the feds, provinces, and cities all point fingers at each other and other than wasting money on the occasional failed program and press conference to make it look like they tried surrender to business as usual. They'd never allow anything like small businesses set up in the front yards of the owner's home. Too radical. Yet it was done before in Vancouver.
That faggot's entire YouTube channel is a joke and left wing propaganda. Walkable cities is just a way to promote more homelessness and crime in inner cities.
>Be me 15 years old. "I want to live modestly in some fresh valley in a cabin!"
>Be me 22. "I want to live in a rural property with lots of land to make a garden, maybe a small farm!"
>Be me 28. "I want to live in out in a secluded neighborhood in a small town."
>Be me 32: "I need a small walkable town!"
Rural areas are mainly poverty stricken shit holes with no culture, no convenience, no options and no decent people. I've looked. Industry has been shipped away, the towns are rotting, the people are rotting and on drugs, there are very few viable options for homes.
The suburbs fucking suck. The "up and coming suburbs starter kit" meme that kicks around here is 100% accurate. Suburb towns are too fucking crowded now. This is made worse in suburbs because there is often no infrastructure to accommodate the crowdedness, and often times the suburb has been built to its limit. So you have to get in your car to drive everywhere, and the traffic sucks, and everyone is a horrible driver now. I can't leave my door in the suburbs without experiencing several massive fuck ups on the road. I'm really trying to drive without raising my heart rate or getting road rage-- its nearly impossible.
I want a small, walkable city or town that hasn't been over run by blacks. All the suburbs by me are getting flooded by them. Even the high cost of living latte town in which I currently reside.
My options for a walk-able town without blacks is 2-3 tourist towns way out of the way from the major metropolitan cities in my state. The cost of living will be higher, and my options will be more scarce. But its absolutely worth it. Its the only way I want to raise my future family.
true, but that isn't the fault of the cities but the archaic zoning. Most U.S cities are a downtown area surrounded by miles of winding suburban roads, but that's not what they're really supposed to be. Those aren't walkable at all, since you're stuck in residential limbo world unless you drive to a strip mall or the downtown.
Bro I live as far north as normal civilization goes. Basically one or two steps away from Inuit living. The town I live in is only accessible by plane during most of the year, the winters are always -40 and worse. If someone said go to a place without niggers, my town would be the number one place for 99% of answers. Despite all of that, theres still a few niggers here. It’s over, they can adapt to the cold now.
The problem with cities is the city itself. They are literal congregations of criminals and leeches and corruption. Solving those problems will solve the city problem.
Cities are zoning. That is by definition the fault of the cities. Your cities are being governed by complete troglodytes. What always struck me as funny is that the democrat run cities are by far the worst examples of complete US car centric dystopia. These guys are constantly on about muh environmentalism and muh homeless, but the cities they run are complete car centric wastelands of pollution and homeless tent communities.
Why are Any Forums shills trying to push walkable cities as some kind of leftist thing
Any Forums is an ecofash board, loves traditional western culture and wants to take cities back from the modern scum that infests them and makes them so shit
Getting the cars and the noise and the smog out of cities is a right wing improvement plan
Leftists are lazy and want to be shuttled everywhere, we don't
Fuck the shills
your "middle class" lifestyle in the suburbs is heavily subsidized by densely populated, city areas that are actually economic productive. your entire existence is built on a paper thin foundation that is all going to collapse in the coming decades as climate change exposes the underlying contradictions. enjoy it while it lasts because you are living on economic timer
>If they have a job, they ain't a nigger in the first place. Not having a job is pretty much the basic requirement for a nigger. If they ain't on welfare or their job doesn't involve firearms and drugs, something is wrong with the picture you're painting.
Wow, it's a good thing they aren't doing crooks. They do crack and sell weed to children. Their kids are also nice and definitely not trying to influence their classmates into thug culture and they are not trying to shoot other black kids bear school. You are right, they may have a job, but even though crime is daily and murders are on a near daily basis, they definitely aren't niggers.
I hope Russia annexes you jackasses
my point was moreso that the "walkable city" idea isn't really represented in most of the nations cities, and I agree. The typical city is as shit as it is at doing it's job bc it doesn't blend residential and commercial, so all the people living in the suburbs have to take their cars everywhere they go. Places with proper urbanism like Brooklyn have this problem less, though things like highways still make the cars a big issue.
The bigger issue with the homelessness is that all the homelessness facilities like donation centers and shelters (also drug dealers) congregate in the cities. That really doesn't have a solution unless you just shut it all down.
opkankeren we zitten vol
Fuck off we're full