I don't believe liberal democracies have the mechanisms to deal with drug addicts

I don't believe liberal democracies have the mechanisms to deal with drug addicts.
Some form of Authoritarianism is needed to deal with them.

Attached: rawImage.jpg (1865x1247, 313.3K)

I don’t understand why the homeless aren’t quietly exterminated. It would be easy to do.

Not really. Just let them die like we did last century, and cut off drug trade routes. Socialism is what perpetuates addict proliferation. See San Francisco

>Some form of Authoritarianism is needed

if police catch one of these niggers, they should lock them up in rehab for one year
dry them out

Why waste resources? A percentage homeless can be reformed and rebuilt. Those who can't can be useful as test subjects, organ donors and fertilizer.

They should unironically be sent to work camps or gulags where they are forced into rehab and work

>Buy a bunch of drugs
>Lace them with massive doses of fentanyl
>pass them out
Don't even need to involve politics

Thank goodness they are wearing masks! So nice of these wonderful citizens to help stop the rampaging Covid 19

You have an extremely undeveloped
Understanding of how social control is
Maintained in a liberal democracy

Agreed. The libertarian argument is to legalize drugs and let each individual deal with their own consequences. But would that really solve problems in a third world country? Would that prevent society from slipping away?

Look at what the Philippines did about their drug problem: death squads. Pissed liberals off, but it solved problems.

The lesson here is that it's not about legalizing drugs, but legalizing the killing of addicts and dealers. Or alternatively, allow the authorities with monopoly-on-violence o do the killings.

Eradicate the dealers, traffickers, distributors and producers immediately, institutionalize the fallen addicts at a rehabilitation or psychiatric facility outside of society. Everyone gets happy. Plenty of countries do this and it has been a success.

Unfortunately you're right, liberal democracies will always side with the criminals, the dealers and the junkies. The system is incompatible when the goal is to bring about order and stability.

zip

Here's what I don't get
China and the Soviet Union were both authoritarian totalitarian states. And while China solved its opium problem the USSR never resolved its problem with alcohol.

We need work camps for the homeless/drug addicts for #1. It wont cure all problems but will help the ones who actually want help but do not know where to start.

I have friends who've worked sugar beets in Montana in these style camps. And if youre a 20 something alcoholic/junkie with face tattoos and dreadlocks, this is your only option.

America's liberal democracy has a constitutional provision to promote the general welfare, but for Republicans that means giving the corporations whatever they want

Unironically this is the whole point. Communist dems refuse to fix problems like housing, crime, and homelessness. In fact they encourage such things and make programs to make the problems worse, all with tax payer funds of course.

Then as the suffering of the average man grows under this type of attack they cry out for more government intervention and gladly submit to more taxes in the hopes that it will finally solve the problem. Politicians promise they will fix it this time for sure, they just need more money and power.

But the problem never gets fixed, on purpose. Instead the dems again make it worse on purpose and the cycle starts over again. They rinse and repeat this until they have all your money and all the power. It's called the "Hegelian dialectic" and it's how globohomo operates.

Note the Republicans also do this to a small degree over things like gun rights. They slow walk any reform because they know it's a powerful issue they can hammer on to get reelected. If Republicans secured US gun rights in an iron clad way there would be no need to flood gun rights groups with money and the conservatives would lose a powerful tool to energize their base every election season. Even know the Republicans are promising an investigation into the FBI and DOJ over the Trump raid but they won't lift a finger till they "retake the house of representatives". Every last bit of it is political theater designed to manipulate and control. Low IQ faggots will deny all this of course but it doesn't make it any less true.

It didn't solve shit in the Philippines and I've seen documentaries about "bounty hunters" who shoot random dudes and plant a joint on them to collect their $200 bounty. You people are so fucking retarded just like I said in my other post. You will beg for your own destruction and it doesn't matter if you are a "leftist" or a "conservative" you are all stupid brain dead niggers who beg daddy government to chain you down. Disgusting wastes of skin if you ask me. Maybe we should give pop quiz IQ tests to people on the street for logic, reasoning, math, and vocabulary. You fail and I shot you in the head. Don't worry user it's for a stronger gene pool and you'll be happier when you are dead anyways.

Drug addicts main problem is that drugs are prohibitively expensive. They wouldn't be out the street if a hit of heroin was 10c.

this nigger wants junkies next door
enjoy living next to a crack den

Living in a modern republic is exhausting, a non-stop kabuki theatre and endless gaslighting, threats, and humiliation. Control metered out to who can yell the loudest and who has the most money. It is all so so so tiresome. And retards really still believe they can vote their way out of it.