I don't believe liberal democracies have the mechanisms to deal with drug addicts

I don't believe liberal democracies have the mechanisms to deal with drug addicts.
Some form of Authoritarianism is needed to deal with them.

Attached: rawImage.jpg (1865x1247, 313.3K)

I don’t understand why the homeless aren’t quietly exterminated. It would be easy to do.

Not really. Just let them die like we did last century, and cut off drug trade routes. Socialism is what perpetuates addict proliferation. See San Francisco

>Some form of Authoritarianism is needed

if police catch one of these niggers, they should lock them up in rehab for one year
dry them out

Why waste resources? A percentage homeless can be reformed and rebuilt. Those who can't can be useful as test subjects, organ donors and fertilizer.

They should unironically be sent to work camps or gulags where they are forced into rehab and work

>Buy a bunch of drugs
>Lace them with massive doses of fentanyl
>pass them out
Don't even need to involve politics

Thank goodness they are wearing masks! So nice of these wonderful citizens to help stop the rampaging Covid 19

You have an extremely undeveloped
Understanding of how social control is
Maintained in a liberal democracy

Agreed. The libertarian argument is to legalize drugs and let each individual deal with their own consequences. But would that really solve problems in a third world country? Would that prevent society from slipping away?

Look at what the Philippines did about their drug problem: death squads. Pissed liberals off, but it solved problems.

The lesson here is that it's not about legalizing drugs, but legalizing the killing of addicts and dealers. Or alternatively, allow the authorities with monopoly-on-violence o do the killings.