So where was he wrong?

I recently read through the manifesto and, I gotta say, largely agree with it. What are the common counter-points?

Attached: industry.jpg (555x414, 113.81K)

Other urls found in this thread:

exploringyourmind.com/the-harvard-experiment-that-led-to-the-unabomber/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

ADX Florence is the only counter to the UNAbro

>common counterpoints
Normies love smartphones and sharing every minute detail of their lives from them.

I think his analysis of the situation is pretty accurate, but his purported solutions are very utopian and impractical. He's a guy who saw the problem, but didn't manage to see any solutions to it. Probably what made him sperg out in the end, understandably.

nothing fundamental, they just can't handle the consequences of taking the tedpill, especially regarding the future of human freedom within big brother society
I e.g think his power process concept is somewhat limited

no he was an MKUltra spook who got his brain fried at Harvard, he at one point wanted to be a tranny

Possible, no idea about that. I just read his manifesto once way back, no idea about the guy himself other than that he was sending mail bombs or something, which is pretty retarded kek.

he bombed random people and was a tranny

>random
>he doesn't know

mostly wrong the problem isn't technology nor innovation but ideas that are driving them and the direction they are headed