Both. Why not?
So which one is it /pol?
Easton Roberts
Justin Davis
Both
Slide thread fuck off kike
Jose Lewis
These two points are not mutually exclusive.
Life is sacred- abortion isn’t an option
Children are expensive- avoid having children
Most leftists seem to believe that having procreative sex is unavoidable and inevitable. Avoid relationships that will lead to offspring. If you’re running the risk of having children, embrace it within a nurturing pair-bond, like marriage. This isn’t rocket science.
>omg it’s Saturday night and I’m dressed like a slut. What if I get pregnant!?
Avoid that lifestyle. Take precautions. Be a better person.
Levi Taylor
Kill all unborn niggers is the official pollack position
James Collins
abortions for non-whites, charity for whites
how about that?
Dominic Edwards
People that advocate for yet more laws that dictate what others do with their bodies is unbased and bluepilled, to make abortion illegal just because a woman having an abortion hurts your fragile ego is by far the most special snowflake move neocons do despite calling leftists snowflakes. Abortion is good for preventing meth heads and deadbeats from having kids, stop being bluepilled and try making your opinions based on what is pragmatic and works instead of advocating for oppressive laws that make our "land of the free" less free and only benefit fragile egos.
Nicholas Cruz
So if you don't want to financially support all of Africa I'm morally sound genociding the continent right? Because apparently the criteria has been set that if you won't support something you can kill it no questions asked.
Noah Diaz
fuck ya mudda
filename
Josiah King
The issue is, is that children are forced to be property of their parents until they come of age. Children are unable to enjoy the full rights granted to all adults on earth, until they reach an arbitrary number, and they are even prohibited from seeking alternative guardians until this arbitrary number is reached. They are stuck in an avoidable situation, because their deadbeat parents and deadbeat government force it on them. A lot of these children are more resourceful, intelligent and motivated than their deadbeat junkie parents, but that is quelled by unjust government enforced rights violations. No child should suffer because their parents are irresponsible, but this has nothing to do with bringing them into the world in the first place.
On the other hand, there are plenty of rational arguments against abortion, which women and abortionists care little about, because they are only concerned with allowing women to exact as much suffering on the populace as they can get away with.
Jace Flores
>I wont let you murder your unborn child therefore I am also obligated to pay your living costs
It isn't.