So which one is it /pol?

>leftists didn't realize that we have programs to help them

Attached: 1599958283464.jpg (848x480, 65.19K)

Nigga do you know what a charity is

yeah but they have to be of anglo-saxon stock proven via genetic testing and the father must be the same.

Both
you shouldn’t kill babies and you should live with the consequences of your actions
now kys troon

Use a condom.

Both.
You get a child, you care for it.
It's not like if they arrived by chance.

i dont get why libs make this argument when the left side images could be reversed and apply to them as well. it hurts them more than it hurts us

What did this bitch do with her food stamps? Probably spent it on drugs and that's not my fucking problem. Can't feed the kid? Then give it up.

Why do you have to embarrass us like this? It's not binary you dumb fuck

Both.

Abortions should not be late term birth control. If you can't afford to have kids you can't afford to have sex.

>how dare republicans believe that you should take responsibility & provide for your child, not ask for hand outs like a gypsy nigger.

first one, and the other side of this is we're going force the father to marry her and be a responsible man who supports his family. We're not going to belittle the single mom. We're just not going to let her be a single mom.

Panel #3 only happens if the woman actively avoids a shelter because she's a lunatic, a junkie, or a border jumper. I always wonder if the person who draws these has no idea how things work, or if they just pretend not to.

>be virtuous
>find a good husband
>have children that will be taken care for by the husband
>be a good wife

oh wow such hard.

>force the father to marry her and be a responsible man who supports his family
sure. how will you do that?

you're right, women and children don't get turned away from those places, but men do

Adoption is an option, faggot.
It goes both fucking ways.

>"no man ever pretended to be virtuous and then abandoned his family!"

these statements don't contradict each other. why does the woman have no control over whether or not she has a baby? was she mind-controlled?

>oh, you're pro-life?
>adopt every child in the world

>babies just appear magically in the womb
this is your brain on leftist retardation

Ohh myyyy goddd this argument is so stupid.
Why is taking responsibility and not getting seamen in you vagina in the first place such a difficult concept for the left to understand?

If you don't want kids....don't have sex or use protection. If you are not ready to be a parent, you are not ready to be having sex.
Why do they think they should have the right to kill a baby?
It's as simple as not getting pregnant in the first place.
If you are unable or unwilling to be a responsible parent......stop fucking for pleasure......you hedonistic slut.

Wear a condom and use birth control you fucking retards.
Or even better... QUIT FUCKING LIKE RABBITS. Keep your genitals put away until the proper time.
None of this is difficult.
Fucking deviants

Attached: 1636249877423.webm (576x432, 1.58M)

Both. Women have the ability to keep their legs closed until marriage.

Correct.

Checked.

Government doesn't exist to provide you material comfort and financial support. It exists to defend your life and rights from enemies foreign and domestic.

Granted, modern governments are shit tier at the latter and spend 90% of their time/effort to do the former, so if you accept the framing of what currently is instead of what it was and should be it's definitely the latter.

Just let them coddle you and your civilization into the grave, guys. They'll just rob the rest of the world and pay them off with a portion of it to see you off in style, then deal with whatever comes by robbing the rest of the world some more.

threats of violence
it's worked for millennia

>1PBTID

Attached: 1658445353957815.jpg (1448x1925, 1.11M)

Women shouldn't have rights, that's what it is.

Both are true
saged and reported for spam

Both. Why not?

Both
Slide thread fuck off kike

These two points are not mutually exclusive.
Life is sacred- abortion isn’t an option
Children are expensive- avoid having children
Most leftists seem to believe that having procreative sex is unavoidable and inevitable. Avoid relationships that will lead to offspring. If you’re running the risk of having children, embrace it within a nurturing pair-bond, like marriage. This isn’t rocket science.
>omg it’s Saturday night and I’m dressed like a slut. What if I get pregnant!?
Avoid that lifestyle. Take precautions. Be a better person.

Kill all unborn niggers is the official pollack position

abortions for non-whites, charity for whites
how about that?

People that advocate for yet more laws that dictate what others do with their bodies is unbased and bluepilled, to make abortion illegal just because a woman having an abortion hurts your fragile ego is by far the most special snowflake move neocons do despite calling leftists snowflakes. Abortion is good for preventing meth heads and deadbeats from having kids, stop being bluepilled and try making your opinions based on what is pragmatic and works instead of advocating for oppressive laws that make our "land of the free" less free and only benefit fragile egos.

So if you don't want to financially support all of Africa I'm morally sound genociding the continent right? Because apparently the criteria has been set that if you won't support something you can kill it no questions asked.

fuck ya mudda

filename

Attached: im using this on a leaf again arent i.jpg (250x250, 6.93K)

The issue is, is that children are forced to be property of their parents until they come of age. Children are unable to enjoy the full rights granted to all adults on earth, until they reach an arbitrary number, and they are even prohibited from seeking alternative guardians until this arbitrary number is reached. They are stuck in an avoidable situation, because their deadbeat parents and deadbeat government force it on them. A lot of these children are more resourceful, intelligent and motivated than their deadbeat junkie parents, but that is quelled by unjust government enforced rights violations. No child should suffer because their parents are irresponsible, but this has nothing to do with bringing them into the world in the first place.

On the other hand, there are plenty of rational arguments against abortion, which women and abortionists care little about, because they are only concerned with allowing women to exact as much suffering on the populace as they can get away with.

Attached: holtquote.jpg (960x960, 123.76K)

>I wont let you murder your unborn child therefore I am also obligated to pay your living costs

It isn't.

Attached: 1639252650600.jpg (750x557, 45.5K)

It’s almost like abortion isn’t the only way to not have a baby. You shitlbs talk about pregnancy as if it’s divine conception.

Both. Stop trying to take responsibility away from women. They fought for equal rights and we gave it to them, so they have an equal share in being responsible fucking citizens and not being such a burden on the system.

If you can't afford a kid, you can't afford to have sex. Simple as. Keep it in your pants. Sex is not a human right.