Australia has had 1 mass shooting since 1996.
>But gun homicides didn't go down
No one said it would, it's targeting mass shootings.
>But it won't work in the US because we're unique snowflakes
I appreciate you feels posting, but I'm gonna go with the data on this one.
>But I want kids to die
Carry on then I guess.
Other urls found in this thread:
gunviolencearchive.org
bbc.com
twitter.com
Burgers are so funny. I pretend you hate you but I truly love you for how dysfunctional you are.
>>But gun homicides didn't go down
so you are admitting defeat then? alright. I take out the Switzerland card. nigger
> work to reduce mass shootings
So what? The foundation of this argument is safety, and "# of mass shootings" is a less relevant statistic than homicide rate. The only reason to use it is propaganda. Proof:
If there were twice as many homicides next year, but half as many mass shootings, would the country be safer? Of course not.
If there were twice as many mass shootings next year, but half as many homicides, would the country be safer? Of course.
Safety follows the homicide statistic, it does not care about the number of mass shootings.
Now considering that; the homicide rate of the USA fell at a quicker rate than the homicide rate of Australia in the post-gun buyback period. Clearly gun control does not work to reduce homicides, meaning it does not make a country safer to enact gun control.
This is all moot however, since safety is not even a good argument in the first place. The right to bear arms is an inalienable right to protect against tyranny and to give each individual the freedom of their own life. Thus, even IF you could prove gun control made us safer (which we established you can't) we would still oppose it on the grounds that liberty is more important than security.
tl;dr
SHALL
very based. safety isn't worth it if you are a soicuck.
There was a mass shooting like 3 weeks ago 2 guys died and 3 were injured.
The Australian government changed the definition of mass shooting to require the shooter commit suicide. If the shooter doesn't do that then it isn't classed as a mass shooting.
>this thread again
Australia doesnt have niggers. No, aboriginals dont count, they dont have the iq necessary to operate guns
To add to what I just said. If the US government changed the definition of mass shooting to require the perpetrator commit suicide then your mass shootings would reduce by like 80%. That's how easy it is to stop mass shootings.
just ban the ar-15 and do not allow weapons to be sold to incels
problem solved
Every child in the USA could be killed in a mass shooting and I still wouldn't give up my guns.
The vast majority of homicides are not committed with ar-15s
majority of big mass shootings are, though
This exact same thread was made yesterday with a swedish flag. I wonder what shill farm these guys are from.
I own zero guns and live in a red as fuck state. I don't need or want one. What I want is zero police and rope so I can watch the life drain slowly from the faces of faggots like you who want to take rights and the ability of self protection from law abiding citizens. Sound good?
>Only gun violence is violent crime.
Wow, I never realized this, thanks OP
I'd rather keep my guns and risk mass shootings than to give them up and be victims to the incessant, endemic, terror that is every-day black shootings.
It's wild to me how, despite blacks shooting MASSIVE numbers of people, including being the most likely demographic to commit a legitimate "mass shooting" - we don't consider all the shootings done by blacks on a daily fucking basis "Mass Shootings."
They literally commit a MASS number of SHOOTINGS every-fucking-day, as a group.
Mass Shootings equate to less than 10% of the every-day shootings committed by niggers.
And it's not like taking guns from niggers stops them from being violent. Look at literally anywhere in the world niggers make up a significant portion of the population. They fuckup everything and everyone, including themselves.
Fuck off - the argument isn't "lower mass shootings." I don't give a fuck about "mass shootings."
I give a fuck about being able to shoot the niggers who are vastly more likely to break into my house and hurt my family.
Cool. So ban the ar
Fuck off, jabbed slave cattle.
see:why
All mass shootings are government operations
>So ban the ar
Ban the Armalite? What did that company do to you? Why Armalite and not Kalashnikov or Smith & Wesson or Barretta? What makes Armalite special?
Or did you think "AR" stood for "Assault Rifle?"
Because if that's the case - you're too ignorant about guns to have a fucking opinion, you retarded fucking mongoloid leftist puke.
Now KYS.
>It's wild to me how, despite blacks shooting MASSIVE numbers of people, including being the most likely demographic to commit a legitimate "mass shooting" - we don't consider all the shootings done by blacks on a daily fucking basis "Mass Shootings."
Well SOMETIMES they do. Black shootings exist in a sort of superposition where they always count towards statistics, but are never discussed in media. This way they can be used to inflate data so that headlines about "X number of mass shootings" can be used to rile up anti-gun sentiment, but they simultaneously avoid any public discussion, which might lead people into a racial discussion.
A black mass shooting both exists and does not exist, it is wholly based upon the observer.
gunviolencearchive.org
pic related is from the last week, all of these shootings will count towards "the number of mass shootings" in the articles your normie friends share about how America has "500 mass shootings a year" or whatever, but none of these will be discussed in the media as a "black male violence problem".
did you enjoy your time in the camps?
bbc.com
You know what also works? Common sense nigger control.
They'll even take these, and associate as many as they can with "Right Wing Terrorism."
For example:
>Omar Mateen
>Shoots up Pulse Night Club
>Muslim
>2nd Gen Migrant
>Hates Fags
>Shoots up faggots at faggot night club.
>Labeled "Right Wing Terrorism."
Or...
>Xavier Micah Johnson
>Radicalized Leftist
>Militant Black Nationalist
>"Vote Blue no matter Who."
>Targeted and Killed SPECIFICALLY White Cops.
>Labelled "Right Wing Terrorist."
They do this because they've successfully associated "Right Wing" to "White Man." You don't have to say "White Men" about anything. Just say "Right Wingers" and immediately anyone who hears that will hear "White Men."
Controlling gangs would fix most of the issues, but since the police are borderline useless (or worse) the people need to be armed. Getting rid of legal guns won’t fix the illegal guns coming through the door. Switzerland also has about 50% of the population armed and hardly anything bad happens over there.
Finally, our gun violence is most rampant in democratic cities with expansive gun control laws and mass welfare systems; neither are fixing the gun problems in America. This isn’t fixing the problem.
Yeah, but how does it correlate to tryannical government officials and policies and state sponsored genocides?