Australia has had 1 mass shooting since 1996.
>But gun homicides didn't go down
No one said it would, it's targeting mass shootings.
>But it won't work in the US because we're unique snowflakes
I appreciate you feels posting, but I'm gonna go with the data on this one.
>But I want kids to die
Carry on then I guess.
Other urls found in this thread:
gunviolencearchive.org
bbc.com
twitter.com
Burgers are so funny. I pretend you hate you but I truly love you for how dysfunctional you are.
>>But gun homicides didn't go down
so you are admitting defeat then? alright. I take out the Switzerland card. nigger
> work to reduce mass shootings
So what? The foundation of this argument is safety, and "# of mass shootings" is a less relevant statistic than homicide rate. The only reason to use it is propaganda. Proof:
If there were twice as many homicides next year, but half as many mass shootings, would the country be safer? Of course not.
If there were twice as many mass shootings next year, but half as many homicides, would the country be safer? Of course.
Safety follows the homicide statistic, it does not care about the number of mass shootings.
Now considering that; the homicide rate of the USA fell at a quicker rate than the homicide rate of Australia in the post-gun buyback period. Clearly gun control does not work to reduce homicides, meaning it does not make a country safer to enact gun control.
This is all moot however, since safety is not even a good argument in the first place. The right to bear arms is an inalienable right to protect against tyranny and to give each individual the freedom of their own life. Thus, even IF you could prove gun control made us safer (which we established you can't) we would still oppose it on the grounds that liberty is more important than security.
tl;dr
SHALL
very based. safety isn't worth it if you are a soicuck.
There was a mass shooting like 3 weeks ago 2 guys died and 3 were injured.
The Australian government changed the definition of mass shooting to require the shooter commit suicide. If the shooter doesn't do that then it isn't classed as a mass shooting.
>this thread again
Australia doesnt have niggers. No, aboriginals dont count, they dont have the iq necessary to operate guns
To add to what I just said. If the US government changed the definition of mass shooting to require the perpetrator commit suicide then your mass shootings would reduce by like 80%. That's how easy it is to stop mass shootings.
just ban the ar-15 and do not allow weapons to be sold to incels
problem solved
Every child in the USA could be killed in a mass shooting and I still wouldn't give up my guns.