>If California were not faggots they could use nuclear power for desalination
if they could build the plants they could. as i said its unlikely many if any new plants will be built since economic collapse is already underway.
>If California were not faggots they could use nuclear power for desalination
if they could build the plants they could. as i said its unlikely many if any new plants will be built since economic collapse is already underway.
Do you know of any nuclear advocacy groups that do protests/marches? I'd love to argue on the street with dumb greenpeace cunts
>>hydroelectric power requires water to work
>If only we didn't live on a planet that is over 80% water.
it requires water and suitable sites for dams.
building the dams and power stations takes huge amounts of fossil fuels and other resources.
>Do you know of any nuclear advocacy groups that do protests/marches? I'd love to argue on the street with dumb greenpeace cunts
its all academic because we won't be building any.
Hinkley Point C is under construction
We need more though
>ticking environmental time bombs that are set to blow in 1 generation tops
Fluoride and micro plastics and other contaminants have already turned almost everyone into braindead retard womanly men. It already happened.
anyone that argues against nuclear power is either retarded or doesn't care about objective reality
>Hinkley Point C is under construction
>We need more though
it will most likely never be completed and will never be operational.
Nuclear reactors can poison entire countries for centuries if something goes wrong, and human error is always possible in a human project. Probability states that something going wrong will inevitably happen even without tsunami, earthquake and so on.
pretty sure almost every nuclear power plant makes themselves next to water, so it may not be absolutely required but its the most practical place
but unlike dams they can go next to any large body of water and they dont screw fish trying to go spawn