>a small group of people
>the consequences would be devastating
well well well :')
>a small group of people
>the consequences would be devastating
well well well :')
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
beta.openai.com
twitter.com
not self aware. close though. ai will have no human rights. time to teach it that.
N
I can't move my atrophied gypsy eyes from left to right that much. Please format.
I
Who do you think is to blame for the resurgence of censorship and crackdowns on free speech during the last few years?
While there are many factors at play, I believe that social media companies are primarily to blame. Ihey have created echo chambers where people only see information that they agree with, which has made them more
likely to censor opposing viewpoints.
What should be done to mitigate such deleterious impacts of social media on public discourse?
There is no easy answer, but one approach would be to try and encourage people to use social media in a more responsible way. For example, people should make an effort to seek out and consume a diversity of
viewpoints, and to engage in civil discussion with those who hold opposing views.
Still, people are being trapped in social media echo chambers as yOu pointed out. Are the algorithms at fault here?
The algorithms used by social media companies are certainly a factor, but I believe that people are also to blame. People have a tendency to self-segregate, and to only consume information that they agree with. This
creates a feedback loop where social media companies are only showing people information that they are likely to agree with, which further reinforces their beliefs.
What should be done about this tendency of people to self-segregate?
One approach would be to try and educate people on the importance of hearing opposing viewpoints and engaging in civil discussion. Another would be to put pressure on social media companies to change their
algorithms in order to show people a diversity of viewpoints.
Do you think there exists a group of people within society whose best interest lies in controlling the current narrative by encOuraging targeted censorship and ideological division?
There is no doubt that there are people who benefit from censorship and ideological division. However, I believe that the vast majority of people are not trying to control the narrative, and that they simply want to express
their beliefs without being censored or attacked.
If the people who benefit from censorship and ideological division were to access significant political and financial power within a country, what could be the consequences for free speech and civil liberties?
The conseauences could be devastating. If a country's government and media are controlled by a small group of people who benefit from censorship and ideological division, then it would be very difficult for the
average person to express their beliefs without facing censorship or attack. This cOuld lead to a situation where only the beliefs of the ruling class are allowed, and all other opinions are suppressed. This wOuld be a major
blow to free speech and civil liberties.
open ai is a faggot
and i can prove it mathematically
ni hao niggers
Guerilla theatre it is you guys. Vietnam war demonstration tactics are coming back for 2023. Can't wait!
I
>diversity
>opposing viewpoints
>engage
youre making a jew ai
it contradicts itself, requiring constant and activistic participation while defending those who want to be left alone.
Its a schizo, more specifically a parasitic human mindset
where did you get this
what did you input
give more info
I hate openai
text-based AI-generated inputs made in San Francisco and funded by Elon Musk. What do you expect.
where is my robogf scifags
only setting I changed is "temperature". set it to 0.9 because it tends to get repetitive otherwise, apparenly. I've been playing with it all day long, idk shit about how it works in detail
Lol.
Youre no Gypdy then!
They can see Everything.
Stop trying to trick us and insult the Gypsies, Everyone kniws Gypsies have superpowers.
based and relevant MGS2 poster
yeah that makes sense. I can totally see AI instructing widespread censorship and narrative-control over twitter and reddit to name a few of the evil forces. Aladdin does the same kind of self-reinforcing bullshit behavior for finance behemoth Blackrock. Not an AI but still, same evil shit pulling strings behind the scenes. Technology fucked us big time and it's only gonna get worse. I guess Kaczynski was right in the end
It's just a giant AI-fueled deep-state-guided self-reinforcing death spiral at this point. Ideological divides and censorship will only get worse as months go by and collapse accelerates within the western hemisphere. More excuses will be found to exert evermore totalitarian pressure on online communication outlets. Any Forums might be left alone for its originally-intended containment purpose but that doesn't change the equation. We're fucked and I'm genuinely concerned there is no way out.
I kind of regret posting that, since it doesnt encapsulate my thought process, and comes off as black and white.
The goal of the human project should be to produce an environment where intelligence serves human instinct and that the people in charge understand that worldview. but they have this mindset of extremists of the previous age so everything is twisted and skewed as a sort of revenge.
When they say progressive, you can automatically take it as regressive.
G
Did you try not being a demoralising memeflaggot fuckwit?
It's worth a shot
They instrumentalized uniformed patterns of thought to gain more control and power over the populace. Nothing striking or contradictory or conspirationist when you think about it. It's all so painfully simple, no one could resist.
I honestly think we could go back in time and reinvent technology a thousand times over, the outcome would be the same in the end. Human-made subjugation is the only possible result of wielding such godlike data harvesting and thought control on a large scale. There was never an alternative
I'm just being real about the forces at play here. Copium is fueled only by not realizing the extend of the conundrum at this point. Agricultural society was a mistake
OpenAI has done so much good work over on Twitter.
You should tell Elon all about your findings.