>a small group of people
>the consequences would be devastating
well well well :')
OpenAI knows
Andrew Bennett
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
beta.openai.com
twitter.com
Luke Mitchell
not self aware. close though. ai will have no human rights. time to teach it that.
Austin Price
N
Kayden Bailey
I can't move my atrophied gypsy eyes from left to right that much. Please format.
I
Chase Jackson
Who do you think is to blame for the resurgence of censorship and crackdowns on free speech during the last few years?
While there are many factors at play, I believe that social media companies are primarily to blame. Ihey have created echo chambers where people only see information that they agree with, which has made them more
likely to censor opposing viewpoints.
What should be done to mitigate such deleterious impacts of social media on public discourse?
There is no easy answer, but one approach would be to try and encourage people to use social media in a more responsible way. For example, people should make an effort to seek out and consume a diversity of
viewpoints, and to engage in civil discussion with those who hold opposing views.
Still, people are being trapped in social media echo chambers as yOu pointed out. Are the algorithms at fault here?
The algorithms used by social media companies are certainly a factor, but I believe that people are also to blame. People have a tendency to self-segregate, and to only consume information that they agree with. This
creates a feedback loop where social media companies are only showing people information that they are likely to agree with, which further reinforces their beliefs.
What should be done about this tendency of people to self-segregate?
One approach would be to try and educate people on the importance of hearing opposing viewpoints and engaging in civil discussion. Another would be to put pressure on social media companies to change their
algorithms in order to show people a diversity of viewpoints.
Do you think there exists a group of people within society whose best interest lies in controlling the current narrative by encOuraging targeted censorship and ideological division?
Josiah Powell
There is no doubt that there are people who benefit from censorship and ideological division. However, I believe that the vast majority of people are not trying to control the narrative, and that they simply want to express
their beliefs without being censored or attacked.
If the people who benefit from censorship and ideological division were to access significant political and financial power within a country, what could be the consequences for free speech and civil liberties?
The conseauences could be devastating. If a country's government and media are controlled by a small group of people who benefit from censorship and ideological division, then it would be very difficult for the
average person to express their beliefs without facing censorship or attack. This cOuld lead to a situation where only the beliefs of the ruling class are allowed, and all other opinions are suppressed. This wOuld be a major
blow to free speech and civil liberties.
Aaron Lewis
Landon Ramirez
open ai is a faggot
and i can prove it mathematically
ni hao niggers
Luke Harris
Guerilla theatre it is you guys. Vietnam war demonstration tactics are coming back for 2023. Can't wait!
Henry Ross
I