>“The latest CDC definition is absent the word ‘immunity’ and just focuses on the stimulation of the body’s immune response.” A spokesperson for the CDC told AP that the overall definition of both “vaccine” and “vaccination” has remained the same. “‘The previous definition…could be interpreted to mean that vaccines were 100% effective, which has never been the case for any vaccine, so the current definition is more transparent,’” the spokesperson said.
>"...while there have been slight changes in wording over time to the definition of "vaccine" on the CDC’s website, those haven’t impacted the overall definition."
>"Dr. Ryan Langlois, a microbiology and immunology professor at the University of Minnesota, says the CDC’s changes 'make total sense,' and add nuance following emerging vaccine developments such as mRNA technology."
The lügenpresse has managed to exceed expectations for their predicted narrative rug-pull. Will the average "doing-my-part" covidnormie be able to even process this? >We changed the definition of vaccines, because the vaccines work.
Retribution shall righteously come for the journalists first, the pharma-establishment can come next.
Antivaxer: a person who doesn't want to take a vaccine or who doesn't support the democratic partys life saving vaccine mandates or votes against people who support vaccine mandates or voice concers about the incentives of Pharma companies to vaccinate billions of people or doesn't support the ongoing fight against racism with vaccines.
Ryan Young
Now lets look at the actual graph...
Whadda ya know, its not just non detectable, its Negative Vacvine Effectiveness. As in you're worse off than an unvaccinated person. Better get your booster :>)
And the cope is amazing ive read what they say. >blah blah blah its cause the unvaccinated arent getting tested. Which makes sense until you think about it for 2 seconds.
Slowly it's going to dawn on them that now they must get boosters for life just to be on par with an unvaccinated tier immunity.
Carter Watson
>is absent the word ‘immunity’ immunity is a shit term. it implies 100% efficacy forever, which is not something any vaccine actually does.
Bentley James
Shut down anyone who questions the government..we need martial law asap
you're correct, according to the new definition kill yourself faggot
Kevin Edwards
and the old definition.
Easton Young
>nice straw man The intended result of vaccine is (or used to be) morbidity-wise >complete immunity to the pathogen-caused disease (most vaccines 95%+ effective) epidemiological-wise >to render communication of pathogen impossible (again most vaccines are 95%+ effective) duration of immune effect after loading dose (and for some vaccine one more dose) >10 years to lifetime
Brody Martin
Calling the series of genetic material injections with the redefined and rendered a marketing term, "vaccine" is misinforming people and thus makes informed consent impossible.
Christian Kelly
>complete immunity > 95%+ effective uh.....
Caleb Reed
Intended result you mong, i. e., if you give someone a measles vaccine, you intend (and expect give efficacy that he'll be lifetime immune to measles and if you require measles vaccination to go on a cruise, an onboard measles outbreak will be statistically impossible.
Thomas Mitchell
>an onboard measles outbreak will be statistically impossible. seems more like a 5% chance from the numbers you're giving me. and a 5% chance is hardly what I'd call "complete immunity"
Elijah Garcia
>15 to 30 days
LMAO Imagine taking it to protect yourself for a month. Oh wait, it's actually just two weeks since protection after the second jab is only assumed to occur two weeks after your second shot. >Take vax >be protected for 2 weeks >get heart attack This is the best time ever.
98% of people who get the measles vaccine aren't "less likely to become infected" or "less likely to get severe symptoms". They're immune. Completely. For life.
Bentley Richardson
Kek...so now the definition aligns with people who have always been anti-vaccine because they always knew that they were never 100% effective irrespective of legacy vaccines or mRNA bullshit.
FUCKING KEK.
Jackson Adams
You fucking retarded Amerishart don't even understand what "95% effective" means anymore since you got constantly bombarded with mental gymnastics for the past 2 years to make you take a useless jab. The measesls jab is more than 97% effective which fucking means that 97% of the people who took the jab have lifetime immunity). The term efficacy in the context of mRNA vaccines has been bastardized beyond recognition. The mRNA jabs just don't fucking work. The efficacy measures that have been declining weekly are no real efficacy measures. It's comparing conditional (on vaccination status) infection numbers that are absolutely unrealibale. You fucking fag.
>immune. completely. 98% >for life no, vaccines wear off and you've already acknowledged this
listen, just skip the words "immunity" and "completely" and I stop arguing.
William Morales
What's even funnier, buried in the Moderna and Pfizer EUA data submitted to the FDA in Murica, shows the efficacy around 1-2%.
Evan Anderson
I like that guy.
Jack Harris
how many people still got polio the same year they took 3 vaccinations for it?
James Lee
>The lügenpresse antivaxxers are so easy. So you're antisemitic, at least a little right? Why did Israel vaccinate so much of their population and not work harder to offer Palestinians vaccinations if they're poison. Antivaxxers have to choose. Are you antisemitic or antivax?
