>“The latest CDC definition is absent the word ‘immunity’ and just focuses on the stimulation of the body’s immune response.” A spokesperson for the CDC told AP that the overall definition of both “vaccine” and “vaccination” has remained the same. “‘The previous definition…could be interpreted to mean that vaccines were 100% effective, which has never been the case for any vaccine, so the current definition is more transparent,’” the spokesperson said.
>"...while there have been slight changes in wording over time to the definition of "vaccine" on the CDC’s website, those haven’t impacted the overall definition."
>"Dr. Ryan Langlois, a microbiology and immunology professor at the University of Minnesota, says the CDC’s changes 'make total sense,' and add nuance following emerging vaccine developments such as mRNA technology."
The lügenpresse has managed to exceed expectations for their predicted narrative rug-pull. Will the average "doing-my-part" covidnormie be able to even process this? >We changed the definition of vaccines, because the vaccines work.
Retribution shall righteously come for the journalists first, the pharma-establishment can come next.
Antivaxer: a person who doesn't want to take a vaccine or who doesn't support the democratic partys life saving vaccine mandates or votes against people who support vaccine mandates or voice concers about the incentives of Pharma companies to vaccinate billions of people or doesn't support the ongoing fight against racism with vaccines.
Ryan Young
Now lets look at the actual graph...
Whadda ya know, its not just non detectable, its Negative Vacvine Effectiveness. As in you're worse off than an unvaccinated person. Better get your booster :>)
And the cope is amazing ive read what they say. >blah blah blah its cause the unvaccinated arent getting tested. Which makes sense until you think about it for 2 seconds.
Slowly it's going to dawn on them that now they must get boosters for life just to be on par with an unvaccinated tier immunity.
