Nice try, faggots. But I was responding to the claim that Ukraine doesn't have BUKs. It has BUKs, and it used them in the warzone during the incident.
The question of whose BUK it was is a different topic altogether. The "followed BUK" intel mostly relies on OSINT data, and OSINT isn't something I would deem as conclusively reliable.
This is my reason for why I think it's less likely for a Russian BUK to be the cause: If Russia provided its own BUK to the rebels, this means that BUK would be connected to Russian communications command centers. Russia wouldn't just drop random strategic-level airdefense equipment with no strings attached.
Now the kicker is: Russia has enormous amounts of radars deployed in the Western and Southern districts. The entirety of Eastern European airspace is under right surveillance up till Germany. For a fully integrated airspace surveillance system to accidentally misidentify a passenger plane and allow its destruction is highly unlikely.
But, we do have a historical precent, from 2001, when Ukraine shot down a civilian airplane over the Black Sea. Mainly due to lack of integrated air-defense logistics.
putin is ultimately responsible for the conditions in which the downing happened
Eli Clark
Give a detailed explanation on how they're responsible for it.
Henry Parker
>This is my reason for why I think it's less likely for a Russian BUK to be the cause: nigger i dont give a fuck what you "think"
never heard of osint sounds like a cope but i dont trust you random fat ugly jobless lonely nigger fuck on the internet over pretty much anyone else t b h so why the fuck do you think i give a shit about your "opinion" who the fuck are you? nobody you cunt
Joseph Rodriguez
>Personally I think Ukraine is responsible, Nobody on the planet believes that. Russian trolls are paid kopecks to post lies like that here, but even they laugh at how retarded it is.
Luke Bell
>Give a detailed explanation on how they're responsible for it I just gave, putin shtated shit in ukraine and plane was shot down during said shit, he is ultimately responsible
Bentley Cooper
>never heard of osint sounds like a cope OSINT is "Open Source Intelligence" What Belingcat and other Twitterastas are using - gathering videos and photos from car dashcams, tiktoks, google maps, flightradar, etc. And presenting this data as "intelligence" Currently OSINT is the main source of the "Russia will invade" narrative. Even though OSINT can provide a good picture on massive military build-ups... you can't rely on OSINT to surgically pin-point 1 specific movement. It's super easy to misinterpret and even manipulate that data.
Jason Perez
this is the black pill
if russian didnt annex a sovereign state for teh first time in over 70 years anybody dared do that shit none of this wouldve happened
Oliver Nelson
That's funny, because I could swear it was Biden/Obama/Nuland who started the shit in Ukraine.
Nicholas Reyes
>OSINT is "Open Source Intelligence" yeah thats a cope
