prev
What are you working on, Any Forums?
/dpt/ - Daily Programming Thread
Noah Reyes
Other urls found in this thread:
Eli Stewart
AI-generated Lucario and Gardevoir porn.
Mason Torres
thank you for using an anime OP.
Cooper Butler
nth for algorithm user's memory
Luis Brooks
How do you compile and run things on Windows. I need to make sure something works on Windows but I have no clue how to actually run it.
Luke Gray
You smash the bits together until it works. Repeat ad infinitum.
If you don't have time for that: Visual Studio (better) or msys2 (less painful).
Jackson Wilson
>Visual Studio (better) or msys2 (less painful)
What? It's the exact opposite of that.
Daniel Edwards
MSVC or cross-compile from Linux with MinGW
Daniel Wood
> 60s -> 20s
> don't even rebuild the db
> 20s -> 3s
Ha, ha. Well, that worked. Anyone has a better way, though? I'm thinking of building only the tables required for each test and nothing else.
Jacob Gray
goto considered based
Lucas Foster
>never had to manage a gazillion project properties for an overbloated solution on an overbloated IDE
That's VS for you - painful
>never had to use more modern DXGI and Direct3D12 interfaces
>never looked into your binary and saw compiler comments from every single object file that you linked in
That's msys2 for you - simply worse.
Carter Nelson
Reminding anons to use github.com
Landon Smith
>cmake
Simply no.
Juan Powell
incrementally refactoring my team's code is making me feel less angry with them and more hopeful about the future.
Hunter Butler
Thank you for using an anime image in the OP.
Justin Collins
Given uint8_t x, which of the following would (You) prefer and why?
A) (int8_t)x >= -32
B) x >= 224 || x < 128
Easton Rivera
#1 is "it is the year 1980 and I am writing Forth and don't even have peephole optimization"
#2 is the option that is aware of what millennia we're in now
Christopher Robinson
Both.
uint8_t x = /*whatever*/;
if((x + 32) < 160)
{}
Evan Lewis
Ironically, GCC 12 or Clang 13 (both from the current millenium, mind you) are unable to optimize the second expression as well as they could. Clang 14 onwards optimizes both to the same optimal code.
Eli Smith
>magical numbers
neither
Ryan Wilson
meant to say if you convert to an appropriate sized integer. the comparison makes no sense as it's currently formulated
Hudson Johnson
Why would anyone do 2 when 1 is more straightforward and readable?