Find an objective flaw.
Find an objective flaw
Christian Foster
Other urls found in this thread:
techempower.com
twitter.com
Wyatt Walker
Looks pretty good from what I can tell. The structs are pretty nice so OOPajeets can't create classes for everything. I just wish you could put predicates on the structs like CLOS.
Austin King
I like it
Anthony Cox
>no ternary operator
>no proper error handling
>no pattern matching
>no filter, reduce, flatMap etc without libraries
And despite all that C# and Java outperform Golang. Pathetic techempower.com
Ethan Nelson
It avoids useful syntax like ternaries, and has a compiler that throws errors (not warnings) for banal things like unused variables, yet it has fucking goto. It hampers people who just want to get something done while still enabling idiots to make spaghetti.
Also the type system and error handling are fucking garbage.
Lincoln Nguyen
no true generics
William Davis
lolwut
Carter Perez
>unused variables help you get something done
Clean your code bucko
Nolan Evans
You're missing the point: it's cognitive dissonant design.
If the programmer is an idiot that cannot be trusted, why give them the most easily abused possible feature (even in a limited form)? If they're not, why throw a hissy fit over such minor things?
Jordan Thomas
Google. Yes. It's an objective flaw.