If they have so much traffic couldn't they show ads?
Jackson Williams
>do away with the one thing they have going for them
Adam Brooks
You could just delete all the child pornography on your servers and then you wouldn't need to buy more HDDs.
Kevin Gray
This. It would be far cheaper to pay a software developer to write a script that scrapes the URLS off of onion sites and automate the process of removing that content from your servers. That's not even a difficult task. Web scraping is piss easy and Tor being involved doesn't really change the difficulty.
Blake Smith
I never got these sites. Never ever. I will forever be unsympathetic to your dipshit problems. All you need to do is >every day we have a limit: 1000 gigabytes free (or something around that amount) globally. This means first comes first serves >also we're setting a local IP limit of 500 megabytes or something >You want to upload still past the limit? Donate You might say "wow that's being a dick", but there's 2 other free services to use. Why is the answer to increasing server costs is expanding? At worse I have to go to zippyshare or catbox and use their site
Nathan Fisher
this would be illegal
Justin Flores
>every day we have a limit: 1000 gigabytes free (or something around that amount) globally. This means first comes first serves >api gets throttled on 00:01
Brody Gonzalez
this would be bad, but I think it would be okay if they deleted old stuff that hasn't been accessed in years
Caleb Hill
Me killing you with a rock would be illegal, scrapping websites isnt
Angel White
They aren't doing that already? Again no sympathy. That's the price of free. Amazon solved that problem anyways, I reckon anonfiles could solve it as well
Dylan Russell
>Amazon solved that problem anyways, I reckon anonfiles could solve it as well Anonfiles cares about anonymity unlike amazon. It would be very hard to stop without infringing on users' privacy. And even if they tried people would figure out a way around it.
Kevin Roberts
>malware ads/redirects (which net them big sums of money) >downloads malware from 3rd party instead of uploaded file praying you dont notice (which is pretty costy as far as im aware)
No, i dont support 12 yo jewish hax0rs. I was naive enough to donate $20 to wikpedia, not falling for this social engineering attempt again. /thread
Nolan Fisher
Retards should be making money off crypto to support the site. They put the cart before the horse.
Ethan Torres
Shalom, many sites are behind registration wall and pretty complex captchas, not to mention the speed of TOR. Have you ever used tor joo?
Charles Bailey
It's probably illegal for them to sit around and act like their servers aren't filled with child porn even though they know A) their servers are filled with child porn, and B) exactly how to identify and delete much of the child porn on their servers What's not illegal, is scraping websites for URLs.
Joseph Lopez
>pretty complex captchas They aren't that complex. I have scipted my way past some of them myself. Many of the chat rooms use the same useless captcha which can be solved by literally just extracting all pixels of a specific color and then running it through OCR. A lot of the other captchas are pretty easy to solve programmatically as well. >not to mention the speed of TOR It's plenty fast enough for scraping URLs >Have you ever used tor joo? I've written scripts that have spammed certain communities on Tor until they became unusable.
Chase Martinez
why havent they implemented an optional time limit for files? not everyone wants or needs a file to stay up forever and it would probably help bring down storage usage
Angel Reyes
nevermind, just read the announcement and its the traffic they're struggling to cope with also >Harddrives to increase file retention (time before deletion) of uploaded files. so do they remove files?
Evan Phillips
>so do they remove files? probably, by the time of last download/visit