Are people saying this lying through their teeth or do they really believe she looks just like Ariel?

Are people saying this lying through their teeth or do they really believe she looks just like Ariel?

Attached: 194F15D0-A307-4805-84FE-690CDB823209.jpg (1125x1206, 469.69K)

Other urls found in this thread:

pastebin
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I mean just move those eyes a few inches further laterally and she def looks like a sea creature

Attached: Pop-Eye-Fish.jpg (960x764, 77.71K)

what kind of a pathetic faggot do you have to be to care anything about the Little Mermaid?

She looks like a fish, so, why not ?

Liberals constantly lie about finding ugly niggers and trannies attractive, stunning, and beautiful. I see it on Reddit all the time.

Attached: IMG_2329.gif (320x240, 1.19M)

You should go back, then, frogfaggot.

Her eyes look cartoony, Ariel is a cartoon, therefore she looks like Ariel.
That's their logic.

They cant seem to be deviating from the herds narrative. They may not even mean it, but theyd rather live a life made entirely of lies, than risk the ire of the herd and its leaders. Theyre like cattle, if the bull moves, the herd follows. Its kind of pathetic really.

Attached: 1645040652486.png (748x443, 225.59K)

hahahahahaha this.

Virtue signaling and cognitive dissonance. Same shit when lefties proclaimed Caitlyn Jenner so beautiful and brave and nominated her woman of the year.

I think this answers your question, OP.
Nobody actually thinks she looks like Ariel, they just either hate redheads, hate people with white skin, fetishize black people, and/or they want to signal their virtue.

The simple fact of the matter is that these social justice ideologues don't sincerely believe a black person can succeed in their own story and so instead of crafting a satisfying narrative and compelling character they take an already established piece of media and race-swap.

The sad part of it all is that there is a legitimate argument to have been made a few decades ago. In societies that are predominately of one kind of people they typically produce plays, movies, shows, etc. starring said kind of people. When it comes to live-action, it really blows that a person that is perfectly talented enough to be in a show doesn't get cast because they weren't graced with certain traits at birth. However in this zeitgeist? It's not that new plays, movies, shows, etc. can't be produced to accommodate every person with talent. It's just people refuse to produce them.

Nah. Nice and toasty here. But go fuck yourself if you can figure out who or what you are?

Ask yourself if that looks like something from Greek or Roman mythology.

pastebin
.com/zzH4Cfcn

>Ariel has a generally female face
>This actress has a generally female face

>full lips
>wide mouth
>not fat
>long hair

That's about all they can see.

It's bots and paid chinks
That's all.

This.

Attached: 1426362107797.jpg (1018x605, 251.25K)

That's a five year old kid or something.

Is the film good or not? Is it entertaining and teach a good moral? Then it's fine, and anythign else is just autism.

Bsed post. You have a very good point, but that's only an issue when they remake something where the character's race is explicit and even more so when it's important to the lore of the character and changing it changes the lore. It can still be done well, however. Just, there are more risks of it going wrong.

However, it's always important to look closely. This example is insignificant as her being black changes nothing. It's not like it's James Bond or something. And with Sandman, Neil Gaiman chose to do that out of his own genuine desire to be racially conscious (and the adaptation was still pretty good).

What point are you actually trying to make here? I mean sure, I do find your mother hot.

facts

>What point are you actually trying to make here?
Liberal faggots lie about ugly people being attractive to virtue signal their faggotry. It's not complicated.

yes a carp