mattwarren.org
With its low level access and the fact that its open source, does this have applications beyond whatever new framework or tooling Redmond seems to shit out on a monthly basis?
Almost the performance of C++ with less pain
Robert Taylor
Other urls found in this thread:
Asher Diaz
how does you does csharp in bangalore?
Grayson Murphy
Too bad it's cucked by Microshit. Literally impossible to use without Visual studio. At least it's DLLs so we don't have to worry about it.
Carter Hughes
>how does you does csharp in bangalore?
Um, I does English in 'Merica.
Christian Stewart
Who the fuck cares about performance? Just spin up more virtual machines.
Zachary Diaz
C# is capable of being used for low level applications, but that doesn't mean it should be used for such applications. As for whether it has applications beyond what Redmond shits out... yes. Unity uses C#, and they do not appear to be based in Redmond.
Kevin Jackson
I wonder why there's not even a single OS written in C# to this day... :thinking:
Kevin Green
Joshua Nelson
>I wonder why there's not even a single OS written in C# to this day...
The big reason is the chunky garbage-collecting runtime. You tend to want more control over things in an OS.
It wouldn't be 100% anyway, but that's because it would need a few bits of assembler to handle some of the guts of bootstrapping and interrupts. You tend to need that even if you code in C. (This part won't be very large.)
Jaxson Reyes
>open source
isdotnetopen.com
Jose Wood
There have been a couple of research OSs developed in C#, but they're no longer in active development. It's possible to use the language for this purpose, but it's not a good choice of languages.
You actually need to turn off the garbage collector when developing an OS in any language. Language runtimes often assume the OS is already present, and therefore will not behave correctly if made to run in an environment where such an OS has not yet been set up.
Jason Morris
pic related has the performance of c++ with less pain
Matthew Campbell
JetBrains rider?
Also the various reductions in bootstrapping Program.cs… and the dotnet cli for bootstrapping a project…
Juan Diaz
Based, C# is going to replace C++, Rust, and Java soon. Kill 3 birds with one stone.
Nicholas Wood
>Java
highly likely
>Rust
have never used this memelang
>C++
nowhere close, try again in a hundred years.
Adam Barnes
STOP
FUCKING STOP
YOU ARE A FUCKING SHILL THE SCREENSHOT SPAMMER WAS RIGHT THAT MICORSOFT RUNS A HIGHLY FUNDED SHILLING CAMPAIGN HERE AND NOW IM BEING GANGSTALKED FOR KNOWING THE TRUTH, SHUT THE FUCK UP AND GO AWAY
Gabriel White
>>Java
>highly likely
Java dominates the enterprise, it's not gonna happen.
Ayden Nelson
>JetBrains
Kek. If I'm gonna pay I'd rather pay for VS.
>dotnet cli
oh boi. You've never touched the cli have you? Try WPF without VS and watch what happens.
Microshit won't open source their xaml shit too.
Christian Bennett
>muh os
How is that relevant and who fucking cares?
Adam Jones
>open source
If you're gonna shill my language at least be honest about it. We all know microsoft deals the cards on dotnet foundation and not all tools are open source.
Jace Lewis
C# is almost good, but still unusable. One major issue with C# is interop with C structs. C# does not support fixed size arrays or unions.
Jacob Clark
are you retarded?
>what is LayoutKind.Explicit
>what is FieldOffset
Brandon Russell
I'd much rather just use Rust. No GC so smaller binaries / wayy faster startup times / much better perf, while having a packaging ecosystem that allows me to use years-old packages without batting an eye or wondering about breakage.