Let’s see if you retards can solve a simple math problem

let’s see if you retards can solve a simple math problem

Attached: 53D86E93-2117-48AE-88FD-FE18EEACC9FB.jpg (980x490, 30.94K)

8

ah yes the classic ambiguously written order of operations problem where there are multiple correct answers depending on how you interpret it, quality post op

1

Depends whether you mean 6/(2(1+2)) or (6/2)(1+2).
Either interpretation of your deprecated and ambiguous notation is valid.
6/(2(1+2)) = 1.
(6/2)(1+2) = 9.

>NononoNONONOOO NOT MY MATHERINOSS

6÷2(1+2)
Distribute the 2 to get rid of the parentheses.
6÷2+4
Division.
3+4
Addition.
7.
PEMDAS, retards.

9……..bitches

What does the P in pemdas stand for retard

G8 b8

Attached: 1406685B-F28A-4E07-BBFC-D24262650422.jpg (1024x893, 75.87K)

Calculations are done from left to right
division and multiplication have same priority so whichever comes first going from left is done first.
brackets have a priority and are done first
so:

6 : 2 x 3
3 x 3
9

the only correct answer, everyone saying otherwise is obviously uneducated.

penis

Holy fuck are you a turbo retard?
It is laid out deep by step.
First you take care of the PARENTHESES.
(There are no Exponents.)
Then you do the DIVISION.
(There is no Multiplication.)
Then you do the ADDITION.
(There is no Subtraction.)
That clear things up for you, zoom zoom?

Implicit multiplication (e.g. 2x, 2(1+2)) is a higher order operation than explicit multiplication and division.

Calm down bro, it's only numbers. It's all made up and shit in the end

Was six million just a made up number?
Fuckin' Nazi.

Follow pemdas
6/2(1+2)
6/2*3
6/6=1

its whatever i want it to be
i will it to be so

Attached: 61758928.jpg (657x527, 33.23K)

This is not a general rule.
Although I understand people using it sometimes this way because it is intuitive.
If you try to write this expression in any major programming language for example you would have to put a sign for multiplication (because there is no such thing as implicit multiplication)

3(3)
Easy.
Next question retards.

9

>This is not a general rule.
6/2x = 9
Solve for x.
>If you try to write this expression in any major programming language for example you would have to put a sign for multiplication (because there is no such thing as implicit multiplication)
You also wouldn't use the obelus operator (÷).

1

well 6/2 = 3
3x = 9
x = 3 (and this is 1+2) from the photo

>If you try to write this expression in any major programming language for example you would have to put a sign for multiplication (because there is no such thing as implicit multiplication)

exactly, but the point is you have to use some symbol to indicate what kind of operation you want to perform, it wouldn't recognize that 3x = 3 multiplied by x
you would have to write something like 3*x in order to be viable.