Post the most compelling UFO/UAP photos, documents you know of

Post the most compelling UFO/UAP photos, documents you know of

Disclosure is happening now. Be aware and keep an open mind

Attached: 1610676784555.webm (480x360, 1.89M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/aSJTnVmI3Q0?t=28
youtu.be/6XD4gQS_-qY
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Attached: FbEwwQWUcAA5gxr.jpg (640x2686, 142.06K)

Attached: 1657266298426.webm (640x358, 1.4M)

Footage of the alleged crashed UFO near Berezovsky (Sverdlovsk region) in 1968, and footage of autopsy of the alien body taken from the crash site allegedly made in Moscow in 1969.

Attached: Capture.png (904x702, 928.39K)

Attached: russian9.jpg (640x481, 34.09K)

Attached: russian11.jpg (640x480, 38.02K)

Weren't those confirmed to just be target balloons or something mundane?

No. There was never an official statement made about the video, unlike the tic tac videos for example.

'Debunkers' claimed they are 80mm flares. Balloons would not be used in a practice capacity, hence the argument they are targeting flares (which are.)
But simple observation disproves the flare theory. You can compare to any video of such flares in action and see that they move quickly on the wind and do not keep formation. It's the laziest possible explanation and is fundamentally flawed.

Attached: FaENo8RXEAEX9Qj.jpg (2040x2048, 556.71K)

Nice never seen this one before, but could easily be drone technology

Nazi tech guys. Not extraterrestrial.

Rare photo of a tic tac

Attached: 1631608292614.png (1128x1060, 902.39K)

It's from a sighting in China. The event shut down an airport for several hours and thousands saw the lights. There was a huge surge of fake images following the original event but the video was on state news at the time. Just look up "china airport ufo" and you'll find mention of it; I think it happened in 2013.

Drones do not carry enough power to be aloft for longer than a few minutes if they're carrying bright lights

Attached: 1610900823921.jpg (2560x1725, 548.89K)

Do you happen to know of any 80mm flare vids in similar conditions I could look at for comparison? Or the origin of this video if nothing official was stated?

If what you're saying is true then this has suddenly become a much more interesting clip for me.

Attached: FZqcUihWQAI6sZH.jpg (1364x766, 238.9K)

Batteries have come a long way over the decade but still present the defeceit in a lot of devices.

No disrespect but you're asking me to find something you can easily find yourself. Having answered this question many times before I have no problem with doing it again, but you ought to take it upon yourself to do such work yourself if you want to be an informed person.

youtu.be/aSJTnVmI3Q0?t=28
Notice each flare has multiple axes of motion

Attached: 1610900695327.jpg (2560x1760, 611.82K)

Attached: 1657670641905.png (2350x1322, 726.61K)

Attached: Rectangle shaped UFOs on ISS live feed.jpg (640x360, 16.2K)

Attached: 2 UFO rectangle shape UFOs.jpg (994x743, 34.06K)

Appreciate the link. Yeah I will dig around more myself later, but this seems like an appropriate place to summarize and discuss cases for/against each clip, no?

youtu.be/6XD4gQS_-qY

The discussion can be had but it's better to discuss more meaningful aspects like the behavior of the impactor later on. Sure, observing they are totally static and thus not flares is something. But if you simply see how they react to the impactor, even entertaining the idea these are flares on parachutes is totally absurd. It's a low effort explanation

I tend to assume when people say what has been normalized as the the main sceptic position that they are shilling. Even if they aren't there is some guilt for being so negligent as to accept that idea given the information available

Attached: 1661156149894672.jpg (2280x1080, 621.6K)