Uhh, guys?

This.

The left wing has been warning about the rise in fascism for years now, they just misunderstand how companies they universally support, like Google, Apple, Amazon, Twitter and Reddit are engaging in the "business" end of fascism because the people they go after are scary right-wing paramilitary.
Banning speech of critics: Check
Banning competitors? Check
Colluding to censor certain people: Check
Collude with government: Check
Operate a monopoly: Check
Controlled mass media: Check

I could even go into the "14 characteristics of fascism" and how they check more boxes than literal Nazi Germany did in the 1940s.

the left is literally the fascists.
fascism means companies have the backing of the state, something the left is calling for.
it's not communism but fascism is closer to communism than capitalism.
anarcho-capitalism is the complete separation of companies and state (no oversight/restrictions/regulations), which is basically as extreme as communism in the opposite direction.

If you fight tooth and nail to allow private businesses to discriminate against individuals because of gay wedding cakes, this is the result.

Attached: 1661657764088333.png (779x772, 618.44K)

spot on

Visa and Mastercard are leaning on Apple, Google, Facebook, and others like major corporate advertisers (coke, Nike, loreal etc) to lean hard on anyone selling a lot of ad space online.
Mastercard Foundation is the normal college educated clubhouse that lectures everyone and steers Mastercards "social" concerns and policies. Fun crowd if you want to have the privilege stack constantly jammed down your throat.

So because we fought so that people weren't forced to do things for the fags?

>fascism means companies have the backing of the state
No it fucking doesn't. Fascism does not have economic policy and is the third way
Adolph Hitler: "The best thing about our economic policy is that we don't have one"

These fucking faggot bootlickers itt

Attached: 1657045582242.jpg (480x360, 42.48K)

competitive (free) market
1000+ independent shops, all within convenient distance, offering similar products
1 of them does not sell to gay people, but you have 999 alternatives as good or better.

the 1 bakery permanently loses customers, causing injury only to itself.
the 999 other bakeries are intimidated by their customers, they are thus coerced by the masses.

a buyers market is compatible with democracy.

cartelized (unfree) market
maximum of six "competitors"
they do not compete, a mesh of financial links between them render them effectively a single entity, even if leaderless and uncoordinated.

they all impose the same policies
the focus is not on business, but leveraging access to critical services (drm and license agreements ensure no products are ever actually sold, but made available as a rental/subscription service) to extort customers to change their behavior.

the objective of the cartel is not economic, but "equity and social governance"

a sellers market is incompatible with democracy.
it represents a reversion to feudalism and aristocracy, if not fascism aka state capitalism aka communism as practiced by mussolini or stalin.

>the objective of the cartel is not economic, but "equity and social governance"
>a sellers market is incompatible with democracy.
>it represents a reversion to feudalism and aristocracy, if not fascism aka state capitalism aka communism as practiced by mussolini or stalin.
Lolbert cope. The reason there is only 6 competitors IS the market. How do you imagine a small business can produce as cheap and quality laptops as some huge corporation with the most modern machinery and automated processes + outsourced, cheap labor?