DDoS-Guard

How do DDoS protection services work?

Why did a Russian DDoS protection service fold to the demands of Western liberals?

Attached: ddos-guard.jpg (600x315, 10.14K)

Other urls found in this thread:

kommersant.ru/doc/5547325
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Two main categories are

a) they have big pipes. Hopefully bigger than the attackers
b) they scrub your traffic at a predetermined location for a fee. Hopefully their capacity is more than the attackers

Detect lots of connections all at once then start dropping the repeats that are part of the DDOS and throttle everyone to keep service available

Learn Haproxy, Varnish etc.

>Why did a Russian DDoS protection service fold to the demands of Western liberals?
Who told you that? You are insufferable for everyone, everywhere.

>How do DDoS protection services work?
They just have a HUGE amount of bandwidth available to absorb the DDoS.
>Why did a Russian DDoS protection service fold to the demands of Western liberals?
They probably just decided that KiwiFarms' money isn't worth the media exposure. Pretty sad that a bunch of retard journos are the new arbiters of what can be hosted on the 'net.

Because Russia is owned by the very same (((people))) as the west is.

>How do DDoS protection services work?
Lots and lots of bandwidth and a global network
>Why did a Russian DDoS protection service fold to the demands of Western liberals?
$$$
Also:
>liberals
lel, these people are neo-libs and commies

wasn't it because kiwifarms had anti-russia shit in it and people reported it to ddosguard

>neo-libs
As a neolib, please don't insult us like that.

Kiwifarms was blocked in Russia due antisemitism by roscomnadzor.

KF had a thread about the war in Ukraine that was overwhelmingly pro-Russian but there were a few pro-Ukrainian posts. The trannies reported these few posts to the Russian authorities.

And people claim transgenders aren't mentally ill.

>another post about some invisible "tranny" (sic!) boogeyman
look out user, the "tranny" is right behind you!

kommersant.ru/doc/5547325

> "The press service of the Russian company confirmed to Kommersant that they stopped providing Kiwi Farms services without waiting for notification from the authorized bodies.

> “We provide services to those who need them, if the client's site has not violated the law or if there has not been an official notification from the authorized bodies about a ban on supporting the resource. Today, DDoS-Guard stopped providing services for the Kiwi Farms forum, without waiting for official notice, ” - Kommersant was told in the company’s press service.

> “We have been following a policy of net neutrality for many years. However, there are things that are unacceptable for us under any circumstances, ” - said a company representative, referring to the acceptable use of the service policy (.pdf). He added that DDoS-Guard received "many calls from ordinary users that this resource has connected our service and violates the acceptable use policy.""

Roskomnadzor already has blocked the site several times, sometimes for the nazi larper minority, sometimes for ridiculous shit like Hitler's face photoshopped onto Santa. They probably realized the sites past with Russian authorities and decided it wasn't worth the trouble.

idk

don't stop firing if you can, the .ru loaded the naked html once within the last 5 minis

that's one muscle twitch too much for my taste

typical neolib

perfect

>Roskomnadzor
How does the guy from nine inch nails have the ability to block websites

A neo-liberal is someone who adopted classical-liberal ideas regarding laissez faire government, especially in regards to the financial system

Regan and Thatcher are the archetype neo-liberals. It has nothing to do with what Americans call "liberals"

It's just another name for cdn

>The trannies reported these few posts to the Russian authorities.
So they are collaborating with the chuds huh

>"many calls from ordinary users"
What the everloving fuck is this? on a RUSSIAN site of all things? They'll just believe a bunch of people who called in to say "this site is full of big meanies" without inquiry , evidence of law violation, or anything else? This is fucking insane. Unless its really basically
>Russian gov't didn't like the site in the past , so we're not going to oppose them
but that isn't what the quote seems to suggest.

Is there any evidence to this? If there is, its shitty on both the crybaby russian gov't (stable gov't typically don't make "you cannot criticize our policy" laws) and those who exploited it just to get the site kicked off. Then again, we don't know for sure either way but if the quote in that Kommersant paper is accurate that's totally different bullshit