Configuring Snap dependencies

Configuring Snap dependencies
>apt install x y z
Configuring Flatpak dependencies
>dozens of external links that could be broken or compromised at any moment
Do RetFags really?

Attached: unversal-feature-image.jpg (800x343, 46.87K)

i knew flatpak was a meme, which is why i compile software on my debian stable

*RedFags

>compiling software
>in 2022

You either compile everything yourself or use native packages, everything else is a meme.
>His win95 pooter can't compile Firefox fast enough
Sounds like a (You) issue

>configuring a setup.exe
>just run it
>it fucking works everywhere

Native Win applications work for longer than Linux ones, but they do break eventually.

>double click an .appimage
>it fucking works everywhere

linux needs this to grow

>clicks .flatpak file
>it installs your flatpak with all its dependencies
>it just works everywhere

let me guess, 700mb for a text editor

>needs internet connection
ngmi

is vaapi in firefox flatpak a thing yet? that's the only reason I haven't considered it.

.flatpak files ship all dependencies themselves.
.flatpakref are the ones that need the internet.

let me guess, you NEED less?

it's not a 3d render software, it's a fucking plain text editor, yes, I need less bloat

If you already have the runtime installed, it's only a few MBs.
That's like complaining about .NET taking 500MB for a simple .NET app: it's not a problem.

Devuan stable chad here.
That's what I do too.
If it isn't in the official repositories, I compile it myself. I refuse to use one of these zoomer package managers.

>using software with mismatched dependencies that are completely different from the ones used in development
No wonder Linux was a joke until recently.

>find .exe file from 20 years ago
>run it
>works
How can Linux fags even compete.

>external links
You mean the official upstream source code repository?
>that could be broken
I don't think serious library developers take down their source code archives willy-nilly.
>or compromised
I knew Canonical is a bit slow with catching up to the latest technology, but it seems like they don't even know what sha256 is.

AppImages don't have runtimes.

This is about development dependencies, not user dependencies, toddler. Manually finding and assorting dev dependencies to make a program for Windows is painstaking gruntwork. Every other OS has figured out solutions for this.