Do you think we should have had the right of choice?

Do you think we should have had the right of choice?
What would you choose if you could? A or B?

Attached: 1653910127650.png (470x330, 47.06K)

Other urls found in this thread:

psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

If I knew my foreskin would be absolutely perfect with no problems, I'd choose B... but the problem is that a large majority of foreskins either have functional issues or look like shit.

An increased risk of PPP, a glans dent from a tight foreskin, phimosis, excessive skin, etc.

I'm glad I was circumcised as a baby because chances are mine would have had at least one issue, and I wouldn't delude myself into thinking it was fine.

Faggot detected

>a large majority of foreskins either have functional issues
Your source is?

> but the problem is that a large majority of foreskins either have functional issues or look like shit.
Cope

i wish i had the right to choose to be born, who gives a shit if you have extra skin on your dick or not

wtf do you mean "source"? It's like saying "there's a reason animals have ears" and you going "source?!"

Attached: images.jpg (247x204, 6.19K)

Like, which would I choose to have in my mouth right now? Probably A.

My 37 years of being a homo and seeing a ton of dicks in my life. It's my opinion based on a large sample of observation.

If you say so.

Look, I've heard uncircumcised penises smell and you have to shower every day due to accumulation of moisture.
A makes your glans drier, therefore is cleaner and more hygienic. I'd choose A every time.

You had sex with millions of men, ok. That's a valid argument.

B, because there is no medical reason for A and I don't consider A cosmetically pleasing since I didn't grow up being told it was.

Ah yes, because there's no other way of seeing a penis other than having sex with someone.

Oh wait...

>I'm glad I was circumcised as a baby

Attached: 8948b5c78634f676daed6be10d45d3cd.png (185x183, 92.63K)

>I'm glad I was circumcised as a baby because chances are mine would have had at least one issue
So you prefer the permanent cortisol scars in your brain over having to deal with a minor issue later on?

how does cutting off skin from the penis cause scars in your brain?

only obese and ugly virgins CHOOSE to get circumsized because they think that is their problem

Attached: ikjaf7.jpg (4725x3550, 1.76M)

> cortisol scar
There's no such thing.

No, you made a claim about the prevalence of issues with having a foreskin, implied said issues were highly likely and then argued that getting mutilated as a baby was preferable to those issues.
How common those issues are has importance user, at least if we are going to credit your opinion on this.

Mutilating your child's genitals is some third world bullshit

Attached: 1659545436923010.jpg (700x667, 60.77K)

Stress hormones user, humans who can speak and rationalize can lower those stress hormones again, infants can't though.
Don't take my word for it though, look up cortisol scarring in relation to circumcision.
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage

I’m fine with being cut, I’m sure being uncut would feel more natural and better. But I got cut at birth, no need to get down on myself for something I have no control of. I think it looks nice and is a solid size

Attached: 313BAE88-E24B-4667-895B-FC5D0BFDDFDF.jpg (1920x888, 387.04K)

if circumcision was so bad then the jews wouldn't be able to run the world with their mutilated dicks yet here we are

70% of America is cut, idiot

>but the problem is that a large majority of foreskins either have functional issues or look like shit.
Absolute horseshit and a cope

Yeah, there IS a reason why animals have ears. There's also a reason why dicks have foreskins. When you make a claim, you better be ready to provide a source for it. Now where's the fucking source, you mutilated dicklett?

Attached: am0oZZnz_700w_0.jpg (600x626, 45.16K)

read the body keeps the score, getting skin chopped off as soon as you come into the world clearly fucks you up, no wonder you murifats shoot up schools

How is that schizo talk in any way refuting anything I said?

Jesus Christ Reid. You just look for any oppurtunity to post your ugly dick, don't you?

reminder

Attached: 1637386809896.png (1290x1001, 92.72K)

That was someone else, I'm .

> How common those issues are has importance user, at least if we are going to credit your opinion on this.
Do you often produce irrefutable evidence whenever you have an opinion on something, in writing?

Could you explain how I could possibly do so when all the evidence of my opinion is impossible to produce since they're images in my head?

> psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage
I'd suggest you read the base material for those studies and see exactly how they came to that conclusion. The testing they did on those animals is much worse than circumcision.

> Absolute horseshit and a cope
Again, if you say so. You should post your dick if you firmly believe otherwise.

Americans gave up their choices because the Jews told them to. You cut your children's dicks because you were told it was cleaner, but it was abuse against a newborn and the foreskins are sold to cosmetics companies for a lot of money. You gave up abortion rights because your jew overlords wanted it, so you were forced to pump out useless shit kids forever. Israel owns America, they watch you argue, they watch you fuck up freedom, and they laugh. America is a fifth world shithole, you believe every piece of shit you're told and even fight for your ignorant plight of shit. But I still don't know if china or Israel will be your eventual lords, whichever, you useless fucks will vote them in and clap when it happens like the fucking retards you are.

Exactly

Probably because they keep shoving their cocks into someone's intestines and getting them covered in shit...

>I'd suggest you read the base material for those studies
Animals cruelty is also bad yes, now go look into the studies they did to claim that circumcision lowers stds and realize that cutting some men in Africa and making conclusions on how they didn't get stds while they were recovering, proves nothing.