Hypothetically speaking...

Hypothetically speaking, let's say ICANN no longer stays neutral and begins making politically and culturally biased decisions, how fucked are we? Do we even have ANY leverage against that?

Attached: ICANN.png (1200x955, 79.96K)

Other urls found in this thread:

gnunet.org/en/gns.html).
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Worst case you will have no internet. Big deal.

Don’t be a nazi.

Start up an alternative called ICANT.

theres other networks than the internet, you know

just make your own internet, goy

>ICANN has received more than $60 million from gTLD auctions,[110] and has accepted the controversial domain name ".sucks" (referring to the primarily US slang for being inferior or objectionable).[111] sucks domains are owned and controlled by the Vox Populi Registry which won the rights for .sucks gTLD in November 2014.[112]


>In a long-running dispute, ICANN has so far declined to allow a Turkish company to purchase the .islam and .halal gTLDs, after the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation objected that the gTLDs should be administered by an organization that represents all the world's 1.6 billion Muslims.[118] After a number of attempts to resolve the issue the domains are still held "on hold".[119]


>In April 2019, ICANN proposed an end to the price cap of org domains[120] and effectively removed it in July in spite of having received 3,252 opposing comments and only six in favor.[121] A few months later, the owner of the domain, the Public Interest Registry, proposed to sell the domain to investment firm Ethos Capital.[122]


>In May 2019, ICANN decided in favor of granting exclusive administration rights to amazon.com for the .amazon gTLD after a 7 year long dispute with the Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization (ACTO). [123][124]

What do you mean neutral? It's already a cash grab jew tier cryno-capitalist company similar to something like Wikipedia

you could use some alternative like gns (gnunet.org/en/gns.html). Looks pretty nice, but I haven't actually used it in production

You can connect to other computers across the internet with DNS, retard. What would happen is that you'd bookmark an IP address instead of typing a domain name into your browser.

Attached: ICANN.png (1200x955, 83.36K)

Something 99.99999999999999999% of internet users can't be bothered to do.

Only because they've had DNS. If it disappeared people would figure it out. In fact it would weed out some of the normies that ruined internet culture and we might get back to some semblance of the real internet again.

It'd be no different than navigating onion sites, and even sub-literate kiddie diddlers can figure out how to do that.

Only HAM radio chads will be able to access the internet. Soon the boomers you mocked will be the only men on Tinder. Mocking you as they take your women

How dumb of an idea would it be to have a distributed network of computers powering an alternate DNS provider (e.g. 10.10.10.10)? You know, the same way crypto holds the network - by way of downloading the blockchain, only this time it is a list matching IP to domain name. Will the billions of requests be sustainable? Access time, file size, uptime, network strength?

Null lost, chud.

Ham radio can access the internet?

HAM radio is better than the internet desu.

Only new packet radios can save us!

There are digital modes that can be used to access the internet (some kind of QAM on limited bands)
very limited to just plain text stuff since TLS violates the no encryption rule of Amateur Radio

ipfs, zeronet, freenet, tor

>Soon the boomers you mocked will be the only men on Tinder. Mocking you as they take your women
There won't be any women on Tinder either. Hamchads will be OK with this.