Why GNU's code style is so fucking horrible?
code.woboq.org
Why GNU's code style is so fucking horrible?
Other urls found in this thread:
github.com
twitter.com
Do something about it. If you don't you end up being a whiner loser who can't even code properly
>inb4 do it yourself
I'm not the one complaining here
(Checked)
/thread
GNU is purely first movers advantage.
It's written in C. Most of this code is about problems in C and has nothing to do with what this function is actually doing. You could probably remove 90% of this code if you wrote it in Lisp.
It's better than k&r or kernel. Only retards who use the tabulation character for indentation think otherwise.
GNU faggots don't know how to code. Personally, I find the style of coding used in the NT low level systems (i.e. nt kernel, ntdll) to be the clearest and most readable.
Linux kernel coding comes in distant 2nd followed by literally everyhing else and then GUHNOO style comes last.
>It's written in C
no it's written in, and may Allah forgive me for uttering this, GNU C
Post your C compiler, faggot.
>my favorite coding style is one I have never personally witnessed
you suck at larping