You need more?

Attached: 1661176800542.png (1200x688, 18.81K)

Other urls found in this thread:

comss.ru/page.php?id=569
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I don't even need that.

Attached: tux-steam-deck.png (3840x3821, 1.05M)

I don’t even need that much

funny thing, I used linux to remove all the windows defender exe files. Then I put a real firewall

What's wrong with Windows Defender? It just werks.

I just disable it... so I need less?

Attached: 1657832709280.jpg (840x1061, 327.24K)

>Then I put a real firewall
Windows Defender isn't a firewall, you retard. Also, Windows Firewall is unironically better than any firewall on Linux. The only thing that comes close is OpenSnitch, which Linux users are too retarded to know they should be using. No, iptables or nftables and their various frontends are not as good as they cannot even block individual applications without blocking every other application which uses the same protocol/port.

>apt-get install ufw
it just werks

ufw is a frontend for iptables and cannot block individual applications without also blocking every other aplication which uses the same protocol/port. It cannot operate at the application level.
>hurr durr.. I use Linux and I want literally everything to be able to communicate via http on ports 80 and 443 just because my web browser can.
You've already proven my previous comment "The only thing that comes close is OpenSnitch, which Linux users are too retarded to know they should be using"

as a piratechad I download risky files constantly and defender misses most of the shit, its fucking useless at detecting crypto-miners for example.

that's literally what I do and it just weeks
seethe more securitard

>This approach allows for the replication of resources (such as VM storage) across a geography that helps reduce the likelihood of interruptions because of events such as natural disasters, civil unrest, power outages, or physical network outages that affect both regions at once. If a region in a pair was affected by a natural disaster, for instance, services would automatically failover to the other region in its region pair.

(((())))

It doesn't work, though. You are just a retard who doesn't understand the concept of application firewalls.

Try Symantec Endpoint Protection
comss.ru/page.php?id=569
>ruskie site
I've been using this site for years and it never failed me. Don't take my word for it; scan it yourself if you don't trust it.

>Add a rule to my Firewall's whitelist to let Firefox through
>Now literally any piece of software can send outgoing HTTP requests
>It totally just werks
Loonix logic

Works on my machine cope harder lol

the freetard has joined the thread

see

The funny part is that he is arguing about something he doesn't know anything about with another freetard who clearly knows more than him.

i have this at my workplace and it replaces the windows firewall with it's own and gives you finer control over your system
[spoiler]i took a copy home and installed it on my personal computer and i haven't gotten infected ever since[/spoiler]

I just called your corpo and told them their admin stole company property. :)