Paedophilia is natural and beautiful. People who condemn it aren't capable of independent thinking

Attached: 8ed82ee89b5ce5ee.jpg (1039x1577, 195.22K)

Not even that. When people think minors, they immediately think of 5 to 8 year old children when in reality these “minors” that were considered attractive were 13 to 15 years old and by that age, girls start to become a lot more attractive and less potato-faced.

I won’t argue about sexual attractiveness but you have to at least admit that some girls that reach that age are very attractive and to say otherwise is just trying too hard to not seem like a pedo—which is the incorrect terminology anyway, it’s hebephilia at that point (if you have to distort definitions to create dysphemisms then it means something is wrong with your argument in the first place).

Attached: 80AEF888-578B-4593-9B6F-98270ABE7089.jpg (612x428, 40.67K)

You know I actually read the study that's posted in the OP image. I know none of you retards have or will but let me just summarize what stood out for me. They recruited their study participants from a sports magazine. No attempt to get a diverse demographic or anything. There were multiple other flaws with the study design. Feel free to read it and think about it. But the only conclusion that can be drawn from this is too selective to mean anything.

Ew, she looks too old

Attached: a62ab72826d8ce96.png (701x818, 705.64K)

people seem to be so anti pedo online, and much less so irl. For example I worked a few years at a warehouse next to a high school and every day when school was let out literally all the men would ogle the girls walking by and talk about how much they wanted to fuck them, and we knew full well they were all 13-16yo

Why is Any Forums obsessed with niggresses?

They’re not. It’s Google pushing their kike agenda.

How could you turn down cunny?

Attached: sample_84fa73dad004ff47e1527e5843d0e253.jpg (850x602, 422K)

>too selective to mean anything
kek, you mustn't read many scientific studies, otherwise you'd know that's literally every study. ffs there was a study that showed around 80% of all studies couldn't be replicated following the same methods in the same settings

Too young

Test group: Discord moderators

Attached: 6d106ef626a27416.jpg (1020x1320, 291.73K)

I guess nobody here really likes Illya

see u in the news, faggot

What’s it IIya?

The tanned girl in the OP

Dumb ESLfag

age of consent in japan is a based 13

I like her

Attached: 1657821591956m.jpg (1024x844, 103.61K)

That's just to prosecute teens, although the countryside might be different

Attached: sample_f5840cbf0db12c5d9e7528090f832998.jpg (850x1089, 242.97K)

cute onahole

Yes, it's a natural method of showing us who is too far gone and needs to be culled from the gene pool. See you in hell.

Attached: IMG_20220714_002236.jpg (538x538, 56.47K)

A lot of people think that but no, it is a plain federal 13, it can vary from prefecture to prefecture, some even having special conditions for relationships below 13 even, but in general, 13

yes, if we kill all the normal people with healthy natural attraction we will be left with only those who find virtually sterile 30yo woman attractive and we will have solved over population

Attached: sample_601e9eb1c1de425a03e87b8ba7725a4f.jpg (850x1202, 878.58K)

nationally yes but local laws are all 16+ and they override
nobody can be bothered to change it because it's literally meaningless

incorrect again weeb

I wanna believe you just so I can argue with people but idk

Attached: sample_54d1288443232053caa39130de155b47.jpg (850x1237, 771.94K)

damn this nigga really doesnt like 20+ women