Aren't you bbc spammers worried you're going to cause a race war, or at the least the blacked staff to be executed?

Aren't you bbc spammers worried you're going to cause a race war, or at the least the blacked staff to be executed?

Attached: 5f29df8acaff3.image.jpg (683x500, 22.36K)

the bbc spammers are jewish and they intend to start a race war. don't take the bait. just ignore racial stuff on Any Forums

if someone is retarded enough to take it seriously and commit violence over it then the blame lies solely on them.

>The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

DAILY REMINDER, BLACK MEN DON'T HAVE BIG COCKS, GOOGLE IT, IT'S EASY TO FACT CHECK THIS HILARIOUS BULLSHIT.

war is good for the human race

but its the only thing they have going for them

>if someone is retarded enough to take it seriously and commit violence over it then the blame lies solely on them.
It's nice to see people returning to a more traditional misunderstanding of freedom of speech. Words DO matter, even/especially in the toilet of the internet. If OP writes some inflammatory bullshit and Alt-user kills a Walmart meat truck worth of minorities, OP is culpable. Stop pretending like you can say whatever the fuck you want without consequences. Addiction to anonymous assholery y'all have developed is the result of tiny amounts of oxytocin released by your hypothalamus every time you do something risky or perverted... Any Forums is literally and figuratively an opium den.

Literally their goal.

>If OP writes some inflammatory bullshit and Alt-user kills a Walmart meat truck worth of minorities, OP is culpable
er, no. no OP is not culpable.

I hope it starts one, it'd be nice to kill every nigger in america

It seems like the goal is masturbating while watching BBC porn. You guys read into this way too much

Slurp slurp slurp

Attached: 46518733.jpg (1000x1500, 410.72K)

What would the *JOOS* have to gain from this?

>no OP is not culpable
Thanks for the demonstration; ig'nants think anonymity is the same thing as moral absolution: it's not. You are using the "no offense bro" defense. Utter bullshit. If someone's words insight a riot then than fat orange fuck deserves equal part in the blame.

Attached: homelander-the-boys.gif (640x370, 1.34M)

Half of these fucks aren't even capable of getting laid and you think they're capable of closing on a race war

Attached: leonardo-dicaprio-laughing.jpg (600x600, 74.75K)

there's a difference between literally just posting images on a fucking image board and actually inciting violence, retard. the fat orange fuck is in the latter category.

>there's a difference between
...there really isn't, especially if both result in violence, you spaz. In either scenario the asshat in question is hiding. The fundamental disconnect here is an understanding of guilt and responsibility, just because someone goes unpunished does not mean they are innocent. If you suggest bad shit and bad shit happens, you might have caused bad shit. Grow up and accept that Any Forums only protects you from your own feelings of shame and inferiority. You are responsible for the consequences of the shit you write and say.

If some retard is screaming on a street corner calling for people to murder one another, and someone does it after encountering said retard, is the corner retard culpable?

What do you think I think?
We are arguing the difference between 'doing what is good' vs 'doing whatever we want so long as we don't get caught' which morally is a moot distinction. Imagine the behavior in question was a universal norm, is the behavior appropriate? More to the point: saying or writing words is a behavior. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.

There's no right and wrong, there's just action and reaction.

Where social mores exist laws are redundant. Where social mores do not exist laws are pointless. Old white dudes had a few good ideas, way back.

Attached: Kant-Categorical-Imperative.png (1500x1125, 51.22K)

>There's no right and wrong
That's some dirty, dirty moral absolution you smearing. I bet you believe it too, and you'll continue believe so right up until someone treads on your particular set of untouchable truths. At which point you'll use your new-found moral outrage to justify your continued shitty behavior.