The GNU General Public License version 3, as released by the Free Software Foundation...

>The GNU General Public License version 3, as released by the Free Software Foundation, has a provision that "strips" DRM of its legal value, so people can break the DRM on GPL software without breaking laws such as the DMCA.
Holy fucking based.
GPL chads... I kneel...

Attached: 1659159244672.png (760x561, 573K)

Other urls found in this thread:

gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html
anweshadas.in/software-licenses-in-fedora-ecosystem/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>DRM on open-source software
Who would so so retarded

yeah but in return GNUstics write code for free. like jannies.
and i piss on dmca regardless of my environment

Breaking DRM is already legal under most circumstances in the US

its called free software, and its based

>Who would so so retarded
gpt needs more time

>admitting to a crime and downplaying redhats immense success
>in the same post
not very based at all!

I didnt know jannies wrote code wtf? based

Holy GNU/Based

Attached: GNU+Dance.gif (240x180, 3.36M)

redhat isnt under gnu licence, it cant be.
paying for stuff and that stuff being under gnu is mutually exclusive.

it would be like saying macos is under bsd licence. no.

elements of red hat are under gnu (?).
elements of macos are under bsd. (gnu too)
doesnt mean that either distro is free software.

as for the crime, theres prescription periods. (amount of time that if the perp wasnt caught, the crime wont be punished)
yes, im that old, kek.