TRANNY HATE THREAD

Based

>why autism
Autism is just a weakness that is exploited by the system. High functioning/Aspergers, tend to display obsessive or fixated/repetitious behaviour. At a stage such as puberty or in a familial environment lacking appropriate same sex role models, they may experiment outside their gender and/or fixate upon it. Especially if they rather non-conformatist (ie. tomboys).

Post surgery attempted suicide rates do not go down.
Success in suicide is largely irrelevant in this matter, as the measure is the volume of attempts.
Given that we know the attempt rate does not lessen, we can make the extrapolation that the surgery itself does little to alleviate the issues they are experiencing.

Trans activists blame this on society and its refusal to accept trans individuals.
However, this rate persists across households/communities.
That is, a highly liberal open LGBT friendly place like San Francisco has a roughly similar rate to say Nashville.

So this suggests the issue does not lie in social acceptance.

One of the main issues with Trans issues, is the use of WPATH's model. That is affirmation as a main direction for care. This allows, access to hormonal therapy more readily without necessitating proper investigation into mental health history and/or abuse they have suffered. As such many individuals have underlying diagnosis that may explain their dysmorphia which are failing to be addressed.

For example, there is a high cormobidity with BPD, depression, anxiety disorders, bi-polar, schizoaffective, histrionics, PTSD/CPTSD, substance abuse disorders, histories of abuse as a child etc.

If you control for this, the rate of trans individuals, drops significantly. What you are left with is mostly people with body dysmorphic disorder.

Furthermore, one of the more complex things, is that studying things like pimozide (which in a single small study removed all interest in crossdressing and transition) is functionally career suicide due to WPATH despite possible value.

There was a huge influx in COI inside USPATH/WPATH around 2011. While called out by the endocrine society it largely went on deaf ears. In 2013, they succeeded in a push on DSM changes, then 2014 succeeded in a case involving Medicare to expand coverage to gender transitions. This in turn matches a few other significant tech trends/cultural changes. Google searches for ftm/genderqueer took a sharp increase around 2011, which makes sense as tumblr and social media sites started cropping up around 2007, and there are a few studies who have shown some interesting statistics about the increase of gender dysphoria among peer groups as miniature clique explosions in a sense. FFLI saw a marked increase in funding from 2012 onwards, and by 2016 transgender causes had bypasses GBT combined. Tawani started dropping funds in I believe 2014? OSF and Arcus also dumped money into it. GATE also got funding and begain its push in 2015. NCTE pushed forward its survey in 2016, which helped earmark even more funding to the cause.

So you basically had a massive propaganda machine worth billions going.

Wyeth had taken a massive hit in 2002, and got bought out by Pfizer in 2009. Their main source of income prior was premarin - HRT for menopausal women. By around what 2000, some 50% of women were on this shit then it was shown to have a huge increase in breast cancer in 2002. Their stock dropped some 60% overnight. Hence the Pfizer take over. It wasn't quite out of the doghouse yet though. 2010 Wyeth was hit again with another major lawsuit for offlabel marketing, and then another for flat out paying people to make up a study. Out of nowhere, you suddenly have a new market with the trans stuff. Sell them T or gnrh or whatever and make a ton scamming the government.

This also coaligns with some major endocrinologists jumping ship - see Stephen Rosenthal, who previously had specialized in diabetes/obseity since the 1980s, suddenly taking a massive interest in gender non-conforming teens in 2012

He's currently leading a study on longterm effects of GNRH in teens. Got something like 5.7 million in 2015 for it. Which is completely COI cause he works frequently as a consultant for AbbVie which is a subsidiary of Abbott Laboratories and makes the T given to ftms.

And that is just one name. You also have prominent gender researchers like Diane Ehrenshaft, doctors like Johanna Olson-Kennedy and Robert Garofalo or even other endocrinologists like Norman Spack.

I should also elaborate on the legal issues facing Troon surgery

Why aren't GRS surgeons being sued? Well it has to do with a very odd grey area.

Normally, you can find retired doctors/surgeons/surgical nurses etc. who will provide expert testimony in cases
This is especially true in theory for trans cases as they can argue they are doing it to protect the trans community from predatory surgeons
Thing is battling experts on pros vs. def is more of a matter for minor issues than largely visible ones
If damage is visible because say a surgeon knicked an artery and didn't notice, the jurors and judge can understand the cause easily
This is odd, because we're talking about destroying healthy bodily organs/parts which makes it grey
You can't just have a surgeon give testimony because its such a bizarre thing to talk about

But to elaborate further
Most of these surgeons operate on a similar manner to informed consent
That is there is a stack of papers you sign for regards to mediation/arbitration
Most of these are essentially waiving rights - its no different than informed consent used for HRT
Then you have the long list of stereotypical surgical stuff - no smoking, etc. because it affects anaesthesia or bloodflow
Then you have the additional papers for things like months of extreme at home care/dilation etc. are specifically there so its easier to block malpractice lawsuits due to patient error

All this for a surgery that has a 65-70% chance of complications.

Based on the legal document of a Canadian case we can see how this works in procedure, they are progressing under informed consent - meaning the child has signed a waiver stating that they understand and consent to:

1. Nature of diagnosis
2. Options and alternatives
3. Multiple steps involved in treatment
4. Details concerning the nature of procedures or drugs administered
5. Partial irreversible damage of hormone blockers
6. Irreversible damage caused by escalating hormone therapy, surgery or psychological/psychiatric/pallitive care
7. Presence or absence of medical research of the foreseeable benefits or risks of treatment

Attached: 1656590765526.jpg (680x680, 95.01K)

Here’s some numbers for you to chew over
Average cost of MTF transition:
> $140,000
Average cost of FTM transition:
> $124,000

Best estimate for trans people is about 1 in 167, though this increases as we hit the Zoomers.
Now taken in percentage it is about 0.5% in the west, which has a population of about 1 billion.

According to these statistics we have roughly 5,000,000 trans people in the USA.

Taking a mean cost of $132,000 x 5,000,000
This is a revenue of roughly $662,500,000,000.

Now given the frankly eye watering amount of money at stake is it any surprise that big pharma funds think tanks that propagandise the destruction of gender norms.

Follow the money.

The best part is the reaction when the swelling goes down.

Medically speaking, if they manage 6" to 6.5" it's a fucking medical miracle.
I have never heard of one being 7" or more.
Most end up in the 4.5" to 5.5" range with a bell curve plot.
Ie. 50% are below 5".

This usually wrecks their morale/self image. Sometimes they kill themselves. Other times they just result to only using strap ons. I don't think I have ever heard of a transition back when they reach that point. Suicide is more likely.

lmao