> heroic AFAB woman testifies against her own political side signifying that she's doing it because it is the right thing and for political gains
> her party immediately backstabs her and starts attacking her person
This is why you will never win an election again.
You are in a cult.
Other urls found in this thread:
theguardian.com
twitter.com
>Go on stand
>Tell story a friend heard from.... Somewhere
>Literally the definition of hearsay
>Secret service even comes out against your account of an account you weren't present for
>...
>Play victim
>I don't know what hearsay is
This is what OP was talking about. You need to read before you type.
>her party immediately backstabs her and starts attacking her person
isn't that what they always do though?
>>Secret service even comes out against your account of an account you weren't present for
No, they didn't and you have no citation.
theguardian.com
Even a left wing source can spin that away from the retardation that it is.
She said it was a story she heard from someone else... Literally hearsay.
the same shit they pulled against kavanaugh
>reportedly
No citation.
Some testimony she put out will require corroboration, but do you think she's lying?
i love it when the media spams liberal propaganda
VOTE DEMOCRAT
Sounds like punditry.
No idea what an AFAB acronym is, but it sounds like something a pundit would assume exists outside the beltway. It doesn't
Of course she is lying.
>a friend heard from.... Somewhere
I forget the dude's name but he said, "What, I never told her that.".
Her motivation to lie would be?
kek, they won't let them testify.
Money from the nevertrumpers.
Instead of making shit up. Why don't you read the official SS press release from yesterday?
and your proof would be?
Why is this a thing if she heard it from someone else? Shouldn't it be hearsay and dismissed?
Yesterday? This shit keeps getting the doors blown off more every hour.
Tony Ornato, that's who she said told him whatever. He denies all of it.
because it is the whole point of calling her to witness. probably some cia bitch.
>Her motivation to lie would be?
>would
I didn't say it IS, but money's usually involved when it come to someone perjuring themselves for no reason.
It doesn't get thrown out until there's no corroboration. We're waiting for more republicans to be honest and come forward.
Good luck, right?
In a real court with cross examination, yes.
>and I have the proof right here.
republicans
I bet she is a real heroic type. Wants to lie but doesn't want to take responsibility. Typical hero liberal woman
She's a republican.
>wants to lie
>under oath
Donny would never testify under oath because then he coxpnsjuldnt lie
"Steve Vladeck, a law professor at the University of Texas in Austin, said: “Don’t be distracted by claims of ‘hearsay’. That goes to whether evidence can be admitted in court, not Congress.
“The key is that Hutchinson testified under oath. If she was lying, she faces felony charges. The same can’t be said for those trying to discredit her testimony.”
>come forward
You need to stop reading just the headlines. Many have come forward. Hundreds of hours of testimony. Piles of evidence. All of it is kept secret if it doesn't fit their agenda. Go ahead, look it up, but not on MSM. People who have testified and provided evidence have everything removed and then accused of the very thing they provided evidence for.
She's being paid fag
Didn't you watch the Kavanagh trial?
>would
As in, What WOULD you say if I wanted to relax around blacks?" WOULD is hypothetical.
*couldnt lie
>democrat
Doesn't mean she's not a libfag. How long will she stay a republican.
Because the jan 6th committee didn't prove jack shit and only showed what was already known. So now they pull a magic card out their ass and extend it by a day to bring up this surprise witness that has information that would be criminal if it can be proven to be true; which it can't because the hearings are now over and they wont allow anyone to debunk it or prove it.
TL;DR Dems need votes for mid terms and the hearings wernt going well.
Worse than that. Assigned Female At Birth.
Just waiting for someone to perjure themselves by directly contradicting her.
Until then, it's just republicans lying their traitor asses off.
If only donny would go under oath to clear his name...but he wont
>and I have the proof right here.
republicans.
It sounds like the people who were actually in the car need to testify under oath.
She's one of the biggest RINOs there are. Can you give me something Republican-like she's done lately? Anything she's said?
There is no way to prove she's lying
Democrats are slick in their bullshit
Hearings arent over magacoper
>republicans lying their traitor asses off
Who? About what?
Where was Ford's proof?
Cope
Per Occam's Razor, I am more inclined to believe that you are the liar at this point.
>I make the proof
Democrats
Go back home redditor
>in a cult
>win an election
when your cult is big enough you won't need to.
She might stay a republican if they cut out their traitorous cancer.
>I believe in any story, gossip, fairy tale, and tarot card reading and I'll threaten anyone with death who tells me otherwise.
The Left.
>There is no way to prove she's lying
Is it because she's not lying?
I gave you a hypothetical to your open-ended question. There is no lying in a hypothetical, retard.
Pretty much everything that is not on the record.
Too many examples to cite.
You fucking faggot
>and I have the proof right here
liberals
>I dont believe what people say under oath, only on media where you can say whatever
Fucking kek