What's it like dating a rich girl?

What's it like dating a rich girl?

Attached: Ichinose.Shiki.full.2329898.jpg (1500x1776, 308.61K)

A fucking headache. It's been 2 hours and she's still faking being asleep

what the fuck are you talking about? is this some rape-play shit?

Distributed OS you silly whore. I'm driving and you're bringing me so bored

bump

This thread again? Jesus.

I'll still answer though since I haven't before. I dated one semi-rich girl during summer after first year of college. Was nothing special after getting used to some nicer places and things. I actually wasn't super into her, and the money didn't change that. But she showed interest in me and was cute enough to not say no tbh.

Having said that I will never forget being at her family's $2 mil+ beach house and nutting in her while looking out her bedroom window to the ocean. I consider it a peak in my life just for the feeling of conquest to it

That sounds really nice honestly.
Do you have any pics of her? Doesn't need to be nudes, just pics that show what kind of person she is, or that you remember her by

So dull personality? Sounds like she was fairly hot at least. What city was this in and how'd you breakup?

Ah man. Yes and no. Only pics are from old facebook photos, and not trying to show her face either. So hard to share. But she was pretty cute and grounded for taking some new international vacation every like 4 months or so

Attached: IMG_20161119_100750.jpg (298x528, 59.77K)

You get to go any of her family weddings? An acquaintance of mine is dating a rich girl and said the weddings he's gone to are ridiculous. Not only the size but the people pulling up are in porsches, lambos, you name it and no one bats an eye.

That's fine, thanks for sharing what you did. I'm feeling some of the nostalgia you're expressing, even though I never nutted in a rich girl at her beach house.
She probably liked you because she saw a lot of good in you. I hope you found someone special.

See . Her personality was actually ok but also just superficial. Wouldn't say she wasn't interesting, but at the same time I was never very interested in what she had to say lol. It was northeast and ultimately she just wanted to date a lot of different guys in college (which she certainly did).
I bet. Idk if she was in that class of people pulling up in lambos at weddings lol but there were probably a few. Wasn't with her long enough to go to a wedding though. She did go to on a family trip somewhere in europe shortly after we broke up, said I could've gone if I was still with her. Saw some pics later and I was like damn lol.
Thanks, she was actually sweeter than I expected her to be initially, which was nice. This was also 18-20 years old so that youthful nostalgia is natural, but still

The applicable parallel is that of the times of Jesus. Whether you belief in the existance of the Messiah or not, you can easily find Jewish texts as available relating to you the fact that Jesus is said to have spent his time in the temple like all the other children. Studying under the Rabbis. And that's what they did. The pharisees then becoming the erudite scholars of their time and this much is perceiveable even to this day in the form of Jewish texts. They, becoming the doctors, the architects and the engineers of their time. This, being routine and hardly at all a matter of genius. Meaning, that the discipline of Jesus is said to have been the excercize of Jewish civility. Whether you belief in the Messiah or not, this is surely true and present in the modern architect and doctor. The conspiracy beginning around the time when you begin believing that Jesus was an architect of the sorcerers and the magicians all of who are said to have been, actually and truly, factual person as far as the Christian religion and bible are said to have been.

Irregardless, the skepticist point of view is that a life well lived is one of dedication and of discipline. Apparently, that of the orthodox Jewish scholars. You therefore have to differentiate between the amish peasants, and their senseless hysteria, and the Jewish Rabbish studying, non-stop, from the ages of infancy to the age of senility. Non-stop. It isn't a matter a of genius. It is a matter of will, of virtue and of dedication. Assuming, that one won't abuse knowledge, manipulate it or deform it. As expected of a holy man. As expected, as should be, of all of society. Surely, beyond a rational hope in the modern world. It is therefore my understanding that undisciplined impulses, amoral perversity and senseless impropriety are surely the cause of the destruction of the modern world. Everyone would like to, and does, ridicule these basic notions of basic reality in effect, until they are the ones fleeing in terror

After this expensive, would you want to marry rich, is it kind of a priority?

caged, or in some way pathetically defeated.

I am not a Jewish Rabbi. Your pornographic collection doesn't stir a bit of emotion in me. I am , however, a philosopher of the occult and belief that impropriety, deviance and contraband are surely greater matters of more important quality. It is certainly my understanding that contraband is a notable term of key importance in modern society and one that has served me well. Contraband doesn't actually mean "prohibited". It never has. Contraband means that you are an union soldier with a Confederate flag or a Catholic with a menorah. That's all that it means. It means that you are in the possession of another team's property. Under discernment, it is then my understanding that your possession of contraband is hardly undermined as an offense, whether such an item is permitted in foreign cultures or not. Meaning, that it doesn't matter if ivory tusks are prohibited in a foreign society or not, irregardless, you are not allowed to possess them unless they are valid as appreciable items in your own human society. This a lengthy trail of reasoning,extending through the 20 years of formal education required for law degree doctorates and the 50 years of life required for Supreme court judges, but that is the fundimental notion behind American civility. You simpy aren't "allowed" to hold on, possess and much less "appreciate" or value a new form uranium-isolate simply because it was "uncharted". It must have been revieved, by a committee, and a linking group of leaders, before being appreciated as an item of interest. By such a measure, you are not allowed to own Ivory. Irregardless of whether it was bought in a country where it is permitted or not, you are not allowed to have it.

That answer can vary a lot from person to person, but for me, nah. It's slightly increased as a priority recently cause I fuckin hate the economy these days lol. But ultimately I'm still pretty well off and don't need a lavish lifestyle or anything.

For me I think the one thing that would be nice, is to not have to worry about budgets when planning/going on a trip. It'd be nice to just decide "hey let's try out this 5-star restaurant" and not have to give it a second thought

You may, instead, own, marble. Or onyx items. And, you are even allowed to post the heads of certain animals in your living room. Instead. And even if Cambodia or Somalia decides to make ivory legal, it is still contraband in the United States. Irregardless of whether it is Germany, Switzerland or Holland that follow as well. The same issue happened with marijuana possession. And the argument is no argument at all in the terms of American society and the predominant religion. America allows the distribution of lethal firearms, perhaps to a much greater degree than other nation in human history, but the Christian society has zero tolerance for murder. As far as an rational discussion is concerned. Meaning, that not all “legal” items are permissible in the Christian religion. You will find wine being permitted in the Christian religion. Obviously. It is very favored in Christian texts. But, the sequence of thought, being in that tobacco isn’t entirely permitted in the Christian religion. If I am not mistake, it was once denigrated as “a devil’s herb” by a Pope. The suggestion being that you cannot search for a pill like Ambien, find it, and begin taking it as a Christian individual simply because it hasn’t been banned by the church. It might. It might. And that is the reason for why you are only allowed to own and appropriate items that are inherently participant components in your culture’s progression. The simple argument being this; is ambien a sin? Not really. But the reciprocal reaction is; have you finished consecrating the sick? Have you finished studying the Greek texts? If not, then you don’t need to be worrying about the sanctified qualities of Ambien. You are only intended to earn merit up the ascension rungs of your own culture. The argument gets more sinister once you find out that most American police officers are of simple families. They aren’t the sons of millionare aristocrats. They are peasants. Peasants.

Their own arrogance is the source of their denial. Generally, they should be working manual labour. With a happer and a chisel. Or, with a power-saw and a bull-dozer. But, in America. Where the pay-rate gets very high even in the manual labour industry. They should be building porch decks, sheds, houses, bridges and sky scrapers. They shouldn’t be chasing guns, chasing criminals, chasing drugs, smacking thieves, beating rapists, and using cages. The pattern of progression is totally absurd. The question being; what makes you look good? Not; what makes someone else look bad? According to all religious discourse, that is rational, no one should be taking a paycheck as compesation for placing a gun around the belt. Especially, while being shameless enough to practice hitting the target in a shooting range. As a practicing Christian. This issue of contraband is severe and the organized religions of the world are far too tolerant. Its down to the point where even Israel has nuclear bombs and militarized control centers. The simple question being; what makes you look good? And there is no argument, every senator is guilty. Every president is guilty. They all sign murder warrants. All of them. Every single one of them. They could have told their parents “fuck you”, and they could all have been daring enough to become a lawyer or an architect, while living a life of comfort and of sanctity. No murder included. But instead, they all sought positions of power and live lifes surrounded by armies, squads, control centers, bombs and nuclear bombs. They are no moral overseers at all. It is an infamy and power-struggle. When being told; you are my son, you will become a Senator as I was! What is so wrong about saying; War is unholy and my Christian belief tells me to become architect. Surely no harm will come of that. Something like 90 percent of all

Politicians are Christians. Its absurd. At best, at best, they are shameless atheists who are desperate enough to pretend that there is no shame in hiding. With deceit. Instead of becoming an architect or a doctor. Both positions of prestige. Neither contraband. Why not? Why live a life where your sole intention is to seek and prey upon the contraband that is allegedly held by others? As a Buddhist, what if my sacred texts tell me to go into a bird shelter, steal all the birds, and to liberate them into the sky. Is that really “Contraband”? Was that your preoccupation beforee even knowing of me? As a lawyer or as a senator? To keep birds out of the sky? Its non-sense. Its non-senses. It is badly lived lives serving as the foundation for an unholy society. Just look at it; the murder statistics. The child abuse statistics. The rape statistics. The unholy state of Israel and America. Why? People sought to find the best rocks to throw, rather than to ascend up their ranks as theological scholars. I am not a religiously minded individual but I am a philosopher and I have not failed in my, truly descent morals, while human society remains a pathetic squalor of human medicrity, envy, obscenity and greed conveyed through warfare, exploitation and black markets.

you having a stroke nigga?

I have actually read his logorrhea and it's very deep-thought and interesting. I'm interested to know more about his worldview

but what the fucks it have to do with dating rich girls?

Precisely. You need to read and analyze his contributions to this thread.

You would realize the utter futility of dating rich girls, amongst other things

Open your mind. Challenge your current way of thinking