Attached: 53CEBEC2-5BA5-4800-81FA-975559E9775F.png (1968x1066, 192.91K)
OH NO NO!
Hudson Mitchell
Leo Parker
its the ++. its bloated.
William Adams
>my program runs slower in a slower language
surprises? none
op? a faggot
Owen Perez
its because you are incremeting C for no reason
waste of cpu cycles
Landon Brown
c++ streams are slow, yes. big news
Henry Scott
The bloat got incremented
Tyler Cook
C++ is faster than C. Lots of stuff can be templated.
Henry Davis
>OH EM GEE MUH 0.2 MILLISECONDS
Henry White
explain the op
time is money, friend
Caleb Walker
>Hello world is slower in C than in ASM
Cbros... we got too cocky
Eli Morris
now try with a non transphobic language like rust
Michael Williams
That scales up in bigger programs
Cooper Rodriguez
>explain the op
iostream is slower than printf.
Cooper Russell
What about Rust?
Oliver Brown
>iostream is slower than printf
Everyone knows. That's why everyone uses printf even in C++. Also this test was done without standard release optimizations.
Logan Martinez
>"hello world" execution speed scales up in bigger programs
Caleb Parker
and c++ doesnt use printf does it
Noah Torres
it's scales invertically. the more codde you write in c the more sluggish it will get. its completley reverse in OO langs like c++ and java. you can have hundreds of thousands of classes and never get over 100 mbs of ram. no one uses c for deskop apps. only linuxtards
Bentley Thomas
it does use Clib functions, but iostream is an abstraction above those and the extra layer and synchronization makes it slower than using printf directly.
Ian Howard
do you earnestly not understand why 0.2 miliseconds is a long time
Brandon Phillips
so c is faster than the abstraction, extra layer and synchronization on top of c (c++)?
Jayden Kelly
i do, but i also understand that this dumb little "print hello world" example has absolutely nothing to do with how fast or slow bigger programs are.