Give a detailed solution to homelessness

Trump created nearly 9,000 Opportunity Zones where capital gains on long-term investments are taxed at zero.

Opportunity Zones attracted $75 billion in funds and driven $52 billion of new investment in economically distressed communities, creating at least 500,000 new jobs.

Approximately 1 million Americans were in process of being lifted from poverty as a result of these new investments.

Private equity investments into businesses in Opportunity Zones were nearly 30 percent higher than investments into businesses in similar areas that were not designated Opportunity Zones.

It's about investment and creating jobs, NOT fucking handouts

You sound like an out of touch boomer. Have you seen the cost of rent? That 15 buck target job isn't going to cut it.

send all of your local homeless bums to california

Attached: KEK.jpg (1200x800, 105.57K)

Lure them all into a single location on a city by city basis. No Russian

affordable housing
comprehensive mental health care
decriminalizing drugs

have you seen the cost of rent? real rent, not what you read about on huffington post you fucking faggot
you can still find single rooms to rent for the $500 range no problem. if you're so poor you can't afford a $2000/month luxury apartment by yourself with a concierge then boo fucking hoo time to do what everyone else does and rent something cheaper

seriously what do you faggots think latino immigrants do? you think they all find $2000/month highrise apartments to rent?
you can live cheap
if you're not a faggot

Send in the right wing death squads

Attached: jr1.jpg (1278x692, 369.47K)

it would have to be compulsory mental health care
homeless people do not want mental health care even if they need it. and drugs being criminal is not the problem. the problem is they do a lot of fucking drugs anyway

There is no solution, the problem is overpopulation.

Yea, it's 2.5k a month here.

> if you're so poor you can't afford a $2000/month luxury apartment by yourself with a concierge then boo fucking hoo time to do what everyone else does and rent something cheaper
literally doesn't exist and people who think like you should just die.

This is absolutely not the place for serious suggestions

>but daddy I JUST HAVE to have the villa on the beach. only poor people live in Costa Mesa :(

Get fucked hipster, tighten your belt and stop thinking your personal value is tied to your ZIP code

simple, cannibalism
solves 3 problems in 1:
Ends the homeless population
Lowers the overpopulation of the world
Shipment of human meat to starving nations which would end world hunger

>Give a detailed solution to homelessness
Type A:
For the homeless who are just down on their luck, guaranteed employment and the building of affordable, guaranteed housing is an easy solution. There are details like dealing with the NIMBYs and getting funding, but it's not actually complicated or hard. It just needs to be done and funded. The long term solution is high density housing interspersed with commercial operations. Things like cheap, small apartments over shops. These housing arrangements are common in other countries but US car culture and NIMBY zoning laws have made them uncommon here to all of our detriment. The NIMBY's need to be told to go fuck themselves: your house's value isn't worth the collapse of society. (If you want to be nice to them, they can be reimbursed for lost value.)

Type B:
The bigger, more complicated problem are the homeless who are homeless because they're addicted to drugs. Solving drug addiction isn't nearly as easy, but it starts with a harm reduction approach:
1: Decriminalize all drugs (and while we're at it, prostitution)
2: Provide free drugs and clean needles to those who want them. Yes that means giving bums heroine.
(These two have the side-benefit of making drug-related crime activity unprofitable.)
3: Encourage bums to only use drugs under supervision at established safe injection sites.
4: Guilt bums to attend treatment for their addiction. Most of them do want to be free of addiction so this isn't that hard.
5: Addiction treatment. That's the hard part.
6: Now with any luck, you have the "down on their luck" homeless in Type A. Guarantee them housing and employment.
7: Encourage these people to continue attending addiction meetings. An addict is rarely "cured."

Invest in vans down by the river.

I bet if you said where you live, we can find something reasonably close that's less than $1k
>oh no i'm a huge faggot i can't live without my own personal apartment and personal kitchen and personal living room and personal bathroom and personal laundry room
goddamn useless faggots like you piss me off

Not even a hipster. I have 2 jobs and still can't afford to live. Life isn't fair, but don't act like the game isn't rigged. My anger is 100% justified.

Homelessness in North America (mainland) and Europe is a game theory problem. I'm not entirely sure I understand the details of the psychology that ignores this, but it wouldn't be the only large social problem that people ignore for ideology.

In the United States, we have something like 10,000 local governments. Counties, cities, you name it. Many are run predominantly by Democrats, many more by Republicans. No matter which political ideology you personally believe it, it only makes sense that somewhere out there some municipality or another would solve homelessness, don't you think? Somewhere, the "good guys" are in charge and have the overwhelming majority on city council to do it right.

But here's why they can't. If they solve homelessness, it costs money. In solving homelessness, it means they have *enough* money to solve it. Right?

However, if they do solve homelessness... like if there used to be 150 homeless in their city, you'd think they'd now have zero homeless right? No. Because the homeless who live in other parts of the country aren't chained to the ground where they are. They aren't deaf, they aren't stupid, and they know there's this magical city out there that if they can only get to it, they too will become whatever the opposite of homeless is.

This city that used to have 150 homeless and solved homelessness now has 5000 homeless. And next month they'll have 15,000. Some of them hitchhiked, others panhandled for bus fare... a few determined individuals hoofed it all 1400 miles.

In solving homelessness, they actually increased it. They had money in the budget to solve it for 150 people, maybe even 250 people... but no matter how much money they allocated for this, they'd always need more. Finding more money just aggravates the problem... instead of 15,000 showing up, they'll have 40,000 (there may be as many as 1.5 million in all of North America, no one's absolutely sure).

To be continued.

I take it looking in a mirror is hard on your blood pressure, jew.

tax rich
feeds poors

Attached: red_menace.jpg (550x705, 77.27K)

Shoot them.

But you can execute one mcmansion owner and house like 50 homeless in his waste of space single family home instead.

that's why it's the place for serious suggestions

Just have some covert black ops pass out free coke laced with a ton of fentanyl. You could OD and poison the human rats in a week. So simple.

there is a type C too: people who literally do not want to work. Nothing especially wrong with them other than some kinda mental problem where they do not want any responsibility at all. they don't want a house. they don't want a job. they actually prefer living in a tent and do the absolute minimum to survive

only real solution is to somehow crack down on handouts and stop letting these people camp out in cities

Or I can kill you.

No you can't.

>expanded mental health treatment
>expanded substance addiction treatment
>expanded low-income housing

It's not fucking rocket science.

Attached: 1390261200442.jpg (126x126, 3.21K)

Lots of gas and cremation

Attached: 129958-004-C9B8B89D.jpg (343x450, 19.4K)

Make all drugs free and ban narcan

that mcmansion would be a condemned wreck within one year if you actually tried this
homeless people always wreck places if they aren't tightly supervised and the place has a full time staff

why do you think no city in the world has done it then

I’m tired of all you fucking pussies whining “wah I can’t pay student loans wah I can’t pay rent” meanwhile you choose to live in expensive areas “because the culture”, and spend money you don’t have on Uber eats, designer drugs, overpriced coffee, and tattoos.

But of course, it’s always someone else’s fault. Just make sure when you inevitably move to a red state, you don’t bring your shit politics that made San Francisco or whatever other fag mecca an unlivable shithole

Homeless "people" are rounded up on the first and third Thursday of every month by local governments. They're taken to work camps where they are fed well by authorities. Once the desired level of weight has been achieved they are slaughtered for their meat. World hunger has been mostly solved, down 56% in the last 5 years.

More jobs and you house the homeless, I don't see the problem.

Step one:
government builds large apartment buildings.

Step two:
Gather homeless and house them in the apartments.

Step three:
Put homeless to work for the government and community and retain part of their wage to pay for the housing.

RAPE DICK+

Are you really paying rent if you don't get an apartment, kitchen, living room, or bathroom or are you just paying the pizzo?

Once you do a reasonable job of solving Type A and Type B, I think it's okay to crack down on Type C. Tell them if they want to live in a tent they can do it in the middle of fucking nowhere. Maybe even buy some cheap land to set aside for that purpose and build some housing on it. If they're seriously mentally ill, asylums exist.

I don't do any of that you spoiled rotten cunt. Go outside instead of getting mad about what fox news feeds you gramps.

>meanwhile you choose to live in expensive areas “because the culture”
If by that you means because that is where the jobs are, yes, otherwise, you just end up spending the money saved on rent to commute an hour to work each way.

Natural selection. Worked for literally billions of years.

They're homeless for a reason. Let them die off.

This isn't even our biggest problem.

The jews are almost successful in destroying our white heritage and genetics. You fat fucking neckbeard beta niggers are too busy cooming and playing call of duty all day to realize having a family and interacting with your community is the single most important thing a man can do.

Luckily new construction is a racket and there are plenty of shitty mcmansions to go around.

Not that user, but
Because it's expensive and an expensive spending bill that helps an unsympathic group of victims is rarely popular. The NIMBYs that make affordable, high density housing impossible are the same assholes with all the money and influence.

Maximillian Robespierre did literally nothing wrong. Kill yourself you cancerous tradfag.

Continued from 880040054:

Now whether you're a staunch Republican or a bleeding heart Democrat, will you actually solve homelessness in your city when this is the inevitable outcome of your brilliant solution?

Or will you secretly think "oh fuck no", and do something that's not a solution?

We already know the answer, of course. They'll do something not a solution. Maybe for the Republicans, they'll do it with a grin on their face, and for the Democrats they'll do it with a heavy heart... but they'll do the non-solution. Classic game theory.

But there is a solution to this meta-problem. It's a boring bureaucratic solution. It's cheap. It's so fucking stupid it seems like it shouldn't work.

You see, these municipal governments need a way to "allocate" the homeless, so that large cities and small towns all take care of (or not) their fair share of the homeless. So that they know which homeless person belongs to which city and so forth.

And then that small city that had 150 homeless, they could solve homelessness for those 150 people, and turn away anyone else who shows up and isn't their responsibility. They could afford to do this, they won't end up needing infinite money to solve it for however many thousands show up.

They need a way to "allocate" the homeless so that cheating cities don't try to claim that all of the homeless belong somewhere else, so that cities either can't cheat at all or that at least cheating is minimized.

They need something along the lines of "one person cuts the pie in two pieces, and the other person gets first choice" so that this is all self-managing. And a few years ago when I was thinking about all of this, it took me 25 or 30 minutes to figure out the answer.

To be continued.

Realistic?
Im a dumbfuck so cant help you there.
Fantasy?
Government unifies an organization to nationally mandate a solution.
They establish a census, hit the big cities hard, have centers in every major state city to be able to reach everyone, any homeless individual can get a bus ticket, shower, registration, all that document info at these state centers so they be shipped out to either Los Angeles, New York City, or some neighboring city of any major city, closer proximity to big city, only makes sense for them to do so as the majority of the homeless population is in big cities.
Kinda like greyhound for homelessness. They cut the beauracratic crap and square it away. Buy some shabby property nobody wants, renovate it, make it an apartment complex of homeless housing, hire armed security guards, maintain the situation. Depending on how long they were on the street, give them some time to adjust.
Make it a given, no more camping out. You have to be registered and sent to these spots. Free food, free shower, free place, free training or therapy. Of course nothing is free but you said fantast.

Houston, Texas implemented a housing first policy for people experiencing homelessness and it was pretty successful. I don't have data at hand for the efficacy of addiction and mental health treatment but both of those are associated with homelessness. You can do further research on that if you want.

the government can spend tax payer money to develop farm land on untouched wilderness, give the people room and board and feed them they also work the land.

I don't know...
Maybe just get rid of a lot of forms of welfare, but create industry and jobs and help people with being prepared to work.

I think probably 90% or more of the homeless is due to the person refusing to get off drugs and hold a job. Ultimately you can't help those types of people, you can let them be homeless or you can send them to a prison island or some shit.

I think the state needs to teach from the bible in schools and stuff so people aren't so fucked up.

No one could completely end homelessness, but I would suggest abolishing public venues and places, that way the private owners of wherever the bums decide to sleep can either kick them out or just kill them for willful trespass.

Why are you on Any Forums and not interacting with your family and community?

I have a very simple solution: round them up and put them into meat-grinders. Adults only, try and allow the young to find their meaning. But if they're over, say 40 and homeless and blightful, waste 'em. I volunteer to go first.

No, I know your type 100%. You’d turn down a full ride at a midwestern state school to pay full price at a similarly ranked east-coast private school, because 300k difference in tuition and cost of living is of less concern than being somewhere “cool” so the people from high school that you never talked to would be envious of your Facebook pics.

Then you graduate and start whining about needing the American taxpayer to cover that student loan debt because humanities are for pretentious fuckin losers.

(You).

>just kill the homeless bro!

God, it must be difficult being around you in real life. Do your friends and family avoid you? I'll bet they do.

You're letting an idea of a person that isn't real live rent free in your head. I have no student loans.

At least they’re not whining about 2.5k a month breaking the bank you broke piece of shit

A quick googling says that the homeless population in the US is around 0.2%, or 2 homeless per 1,000 people. The homeless population of Singapore is around 0.017%, or about 2 homeless per 10,000.
What is Singapore doing that America is not? They have a powerful government with a big social safety net which takes actual responsibility for things like housing.

Here ya go:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_housing_in_Singapore

Attached: CriticalRaptor.png (528x400, 298.12K)