Eyes

Eyes

Attached: yzdcaeh.jpg (500x500, 49.9K)

This is completely incorrect. My wife and I both have brown eyes, her dad was blonde hair blue eyes, my das green eyes blonde hair, my oldest is blue eyes brown hair, my second is blonde hair brown eyes, my 6 month old is blue eyes no hair yet, she's half korean and German black hair, I'm half Italian brown hair.

No Matter the color they all see you're the big gay

Carrier doesn't equal the actual eye colur of the parents dude, it means the DNA they carry and that only includes their actual eyecolour.

So baedt on your example you can hopefully do the math yourself, right?

Bottom left corner?

So how is that picture incorrect?

It doesn't really work this way (I am a geneticist). Eye colour is controlled by a plethora of genes. It isn't a simple Punnet square. They teach you simple Punnet squares in middle school because it's technically true and it's a good way to give kids a basic understanding of inheritance.

>it's technically true
There's more than brown and blue, but the general concept of inheritance is pretty much accurate right?

In the same way the ocean is pretty much hydrogen water and saline. There's way more to it than that. Recesive genes don't just magically change eye color wheb both parents share that same color. Blue eyes are rare. Get over it idiots

Oxygen* not water. Derf

Oh look, more kalergi plan race mixing propaganda.

You will fuck the black woman and be happy, goyim.

Attached: israel kalergi.jpg (600x311, 116.04K)

literal retard

Generally I guess. Okay, let me give a short explanation. There are, let's say, sixteen different genes (spots on your genome with any number of different possible codes) that influence eye colour. So for each of those genes you could make a Punnet square (the things in the OP pic). And then those resulting expressions would interplay with each other in some way to produce the phenotype: the eye colour. I don't know the genetic architecture of eyes in specific, but the way these gene expressions interplay is usually complicated. Sometimes one gene will cancel out the effect of another gene, sometimes one gene could cancel the effects of the gene affecting the gene, etc.

If the point of the OP post is just to prove that blue eyes are recessive as a general rule, it's true. Yes, mudding up your genes will make the chance of having a kid with blue eyes exceedingly low.

Blue eyes were traced to one person fairly recently in the scale of human history.
Both do not need to be carriers.

what if i my parents have blue and green and i have grey

>Yes, mudding up your genes will make the chance of having a kid with blue eyes exceedingly low.
Actually I'd like to specify; my vague understanding is that the OP image makes it seem much more likely than it would be in reality.

16 genes affect eye color
You're all retarded

>mudding up your genes will make the chance of having a kid with blue eyes exceedingly low
It's 0% until the blue eye mixes with pure brown eye, anything above 0% is an improvement

You gay

Yeah it's pretty simple. There are other genes that affect the amount of speckles in the eye and the exact shade, but this is what determines the base eye color

Based and eye pilled

shitpost. Both me and my brother have blue eyes and both our parents have brown eyes

Bottom left corner