How can I refute this stupid meme?

How can I refute this stupid meme?

Attached: 1653964359581.jpg (989x748, 145.78K)

It's anachronistic af? IDK what else tbh.

Native Americans were behind technologically because they never had any environmental drives to develop advanced metallurgy and they also did not have access to horses or other similar beasts of burden. These are just two factors, but there's more to it than that.

>native Americans didn't have horses
you dumb

Thanks, I just swapped out "native american" with african and it works.

Imagine arguimg against fact. Idiot.

>calls someone dumb over something that is objectively true
>uses "you" instead of "you're"
Take your meds

You cant

lol refute? all the good niggers evolved

Horses were brought over to America. Wild horses or left over horses from the ones that were brought over are extremely rare. The only horses Native Americans were riding were the ones the French traded them and your mom

horses are indigenous to north america

WRONG

I mean no it takes literally 5 seconds to google

You can point out how The Netherlands couldn't ever colonize anything seeing how they were at one time subjected to France and France surrenders to absolutely anyone. I mean just check some of the historical pants the men used to wear, some proper gay shit right there.

>Originally, horses were present in North America way before the Spanish settlers arrived on the continent. However, for unknown reasons, they went extinct around 10,000 years ago, together with other large herbivores.
I mean technically he is correct

If you've ever read guns, germs and steel you'll realize europeans have better animals to domesticate which taught them how to conquer your environment. Basically europeans had more learning opportunities.

Not to mention europe is protected by many great seas, so the generations of migrants to europe faced less migration resistance and experienced less conflict while there in comparison to the melting pot of north africa. Conflict makes it harder to progress as a civilization because civilizations keep getting wiped out before they grow to their peaks. I'm not sure if Guns, Germs, and Steel will tell you this but it's my own words.

Attached: Buddha-Edited-2-750x498.jpg (750x498, 63.34K)

Horses went extinct in NA during the Pleistocene and were reintroduced by the spanish.

>How can I refute this stupid meme?
it's a european judgement of wealth and sophistication, and by stealing their land it did become their fault. without the best farmland most conquered peoples have no choice but to work for their oppressors.

Primitive doesn't mean a lesser human. Only dorks obsess over IQ. Niggers act this way in America because we live in an unnatural Jewish system. There is nothing lesser or wrong about a noble savage. I would argue that their way of life is more respectable then that of a peasant.

This had better be bait
We do have to point out that NA horses were to small to ride like the ones introduced by Europe.
The one and only time White people stole land from Bantus was the Boers running away from Britain cuz "ur gunna taek ur slaves"
>Sound familiar? LOL.
Even then, the Brits punished them harshly for it, and not many remain in the Bantu areas of South Africa.

Disarm America now before it's too late

Could the smaller horses still be used to pull carts and things like that?

>I mean no it takes literally 5 seconds to google
So google it then.

IDK, but they were wiped out long before any Native had any idea on how to build civilization, so in the end it doesn't really matter.
One thing to point out is that the Inca did domesticate Llamas and Alpacas. However, because of all the jungle separating Incan civilization from Mexican or Mound Builder cultures, the innovation could never make it very far. If the Americas would have been left alone for a few hundred years, maybe it could have spread to the Guarani or Mapuche, but that's assuming they ever would have developed civilization that would have found Llamas and Alpacas useful.