Give me ONE good reason why someone shouldn't be able to marry an 11 year old

Give me ONE good reason why someone shouldn't be able to marry an 11 year old.
>pro-tip, you cant

Attached: file.png (790x675, 607.66K)

I really cant but if I had to say it would be be due to a lack of time spent together.
Around that age their personality is mostly set however its a questionable thing to say if youve really been together log enough to know if you two are a good match.
This however is from a purely benevolent perspective of the adult. Should the adult not actually love their would be partner its very doubtful the youth will be well prepared to deal with any sort of intrigue or emotional difficulty.
I suppose the quick fix would be requiring parental approval but again parents are not always out seeking the well being of their child.

*long enough

If you've been around a child since they were say, 4-5, then it seems perfectly reasonable that you would be close enough to marry at 11 years.

reason: she looks like bottom right.

sure, but she was peruvian and 5 years old, an 11 year old european girl is much more cute

the problem with with 11 year olds is them getting older. i mean i'm all for fucking them but once your precious 11 year old becomes 14+ and you are married to her you have the problem of getting rid of her.

she'd have a child by that point, so the problem solves itself in a few years

I thought of that. Such is the exception and not the rule. One must also consider their personality is shifting. Will they love and cherish someone at age 30 because they did so through their entire youth? The answer can only be maybe.
I think it an important question not that any weight is placed on maintaining the longevity of marriages these days. Its also extremely questionable if the government should have any involvement between what two decide about the status of their personal relationship.

They can't consent and nobody should be married anyway. Marriage is already a kind of slavery and being married to a child just straight up enslaves the child. They can't defend themselves against your predation and they don't know any better. If you value freedom then you should value the freedom of the child, which you inhibit by marrying/enslaving them

>They can't consent
why not?

Child's body isn't meant to hold a baby that's 1/3 its size.

>You can't marry an 11 year old you sick fuck!
>Pump them full of hormones and hormone blockers because they're "trans" instead.

Marriage is the topic not sex. Its also worth saying if the innately prime breeding age of a human female unsuited for breeding then no age is. Such a stance is a whole other conversation though.

> old enough to change their gender permanently
> 11 year olds are too young to understand marriage and what it means

> marriage is slavery

This is why no one takes leftists seriously

They aren't old enough. They don't know how to make good decisions.

how about you finish your pitiful life.

It's just a silly practice. Why chain yourself to something (especially legally), ever? What do you have to gain from it that you would not gain from a non-married relationship?

Straight up false
Tax reasons, religious reasons

If two people are getting married and they're both doing doing so under their own free will what exactly slavery about it ?

While a perfectly fine stance to have the way its phrased is without substance and seems like the regurgitation of popular opinion.
Things that should be included (without circular logic) would be aside from age itself what aspects make a person "old enough" and without ambiguity how precisely would one determine from individual to individual when they are able to make good decisions. At least to the extent marriage is involved.
Should an individual be lacking in either of those areas under what circumstance if any would those two aspects need no longer apply?
Then one must ask if their personal will and beliefs should supersede anothers.

Pedo alert!
You watching FBI?
fuggen better be