Who has the best designed kernel architecture out of Windows NT, XNU and Linux?
Coders of Any Forums, Who Has The Best Kernel Architecture And Why?
Other urls found in this thread:
lispm.de
github.com
twitter.com
Let me just look at the Windows kernel source code real quick...
windows of course
XNU+Linux
Best if we don't look at pragmatic stuff like driver support and just consider the architecture? It would probably be seL4 or QNX.
BSD.
Aren't both of those developed in the 80s and only for micro/embedded devices?
Who uses bsd
plan 9, because.
I do
big sucker of dicks
They were started quite a while ago yes, but they're still developed. Mostly used on embedded devices. I guess you could run them on your desktop but that would be even more hardcore than using OpenBSD as your main OS.
the one who can run my game better
Plan 9/Inferno
QNX
Herd (but Herd was never complete and you could say the design was to blame for that)
DragonFlyBSD (lockless kernel)
NT (despite it's interface, it does have a modular driver system that's pretty robust)
XNU (stable and powerful but still a wierd hybrid of a thing)
Linux (Surprisingly I'm ranking Linux last, but maybe it deserves to be much higher, after all, it's lightweight, could actually be finished, can be rock stable, has a plethora of drivers available) but since this was a ranking of design only, I can't think of anything that makes it a good design, theory wise, thst could easily change
Genera and Mezzano
lispm.de
github.com
kys troon
Apple, Sony
>Apple
Based on FreeBSD
>SONY
Based on NetBSD
NT is much more structured.
Linux kernel is mostly developed through brute force and concentrated autism. But it's actually a pretty terrible architecture, at least from a security point of view.
Nice try, but linux is much more secure than windows.
Even windows noobs know this to be true.