Decide to use Linux for privacy, > pick ubuntu, "uhm actually user, ubuntu is owned by canonical, they put telemtry on everything" > switch to Fedora, "user, redhat owns fedora, youre using a corpo distro, also SELinux is bad too" > switch to Arch " uuuuum user, the AUR is the unsafest place to download software, also it breaks every month"
>follow a guide to remove Canonical telemetry >only an issue for contrarians (not inherently bad) and schizos >don't install anything you don't trust from the AUR
Christopher Hughes
Raptor systems POWER9 Talos II or Blackbird are open down to the hardware level and allow you to view, edit, sign and compile your own firmware. Problem is they are a niche product because of this and were already expensive prior to the kung-flu and component shortages. They run any modern Linux distro built for ppc64le.
Carter Edwards
>You have to compromise on both to a degree would you mind explaining why?
Andrew Bell
...
Anthony Gray
Gaming need steam, and steam is a social network, and a social network tracks you, you have to learn to partition stuff in hardware level
>schizos flanderizing ganoo/linux as "the privacy OS" go use openbsd you larping fags, fuck off we're full
Jason Foster
Think about it. Digital footprints leave a trail right to you, logging into games, socials, email, paying for services. all these things. If youre going to also want kevin mitnick levels of freedom from prying federal/corporate eyes you cant engage in those behaviours. Either machine-seperate those habits or pick a "pretty good" privacy model. Not to say you cant protect your privacy, youre just not going all the way in a general purpose pc