This is you

This is you

Attached: bylcc.jpg (500x380, 50.63K)

Other urls found in this thread:

abcnews.go.com/amp/Health/ReproductiveHealth/story?id=4258128&page=1
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Theres two different people there you utter fucking mongaloid

Ok, Chaim.

Attached: Screenshot_2022-05-20_13-54-56.png (705x840, 179.8K)

looks like Any Forumsfags

Attached: 334526579070.jpg (1050x700, 158.29K)

>Theres two different people there you utter fucking mongaloid

Attached: 3544568.jpg (410x612, 31.48K)

ayo dats me??

not cool user, incestsexuals are valid

>Pol is more diverse than mostly white leftists.
>Attacks the interests they participate in.

No one ever claimed that inbreeding was a reasonable alternative to cross breeding. Literal nigger

>attacks interests same leftists participate in.

Try hard

What is it about retards who keep thinking eugenics and inbreeding are the same thing? You're either a troll or seriously fucking retarded. Do you have any idea how small your sample population can be before you risk genetic defect? You can get as low as 10k with no issue.

Jew thread, keep scrolling.

There was a study in Iceland over a decade ago that found the more closely related two individuals are, the more genetically fit their offspring will likely be. This is only confounded by inbreeding depression at 2nd cousin relatedness or closer. Third and fourth cousin couples seem to exhibit the greatest genetic fitness. They have more children and grandchildren, and those offspring are less likely to die young. It makes sense, really. The more genetically distant you are from someone, the less reproductively compatible you are.

abcnews.go.com/amp/Health/ReproductiveHealth/story?id=4258128&page=1

>The more genetically distant you are from someone, the less reproductively compatible you are.
That's the purpose of racemixing. Reducing the distance and created a larger gene pool for your people

>abcnews.go.com/amp/Health/ReproductiveHealth/story?id=4258128&page=1
Interesting read. Once again suggesting the leftist's inability for nuanced thinking made them fall for yet another deliberate misconception. I remember having a similar debate with a lefty friends a few years ago and finding studies who claimed that in theory a harem involving one man and 40-something women would be the lowest possible amount of genetic diversity required to avoid inbreeding defects and others that said odds of genetic defects similar to those found in inbreeding would increase if the genetic differences between two parents was too great

That is the opposite of genetic diversity. Increasing genetic difference leads to speciation. That is known as divergent evolution. There is no reason to attempt what you're suggesting, unless you want to prevent evolution

The more inbred you get the less genetically diverse you are. Global racemixing slowly creates a global gene pool

The alternative creates fucked up kids in a few generations.

>This is you

Attached: 16508714535260.png (320x546, 221.05K)

Outbreeding is bad. It leads to lower fertility and higher infant mortality.