Why did the mainstream desktop computing world adopt proprietary garbage malware OSes like Windows and macOS instead of...

Why did the mainstream desktop computing world adopt proprietary garbage malware OSes like Windows and macOS instead of a free as in freedom OS like GNU/Linux?

Attached: illya_rms.png (721x934, 1020.98K)

Other urls found in this thread:

poa.st/@ehhh
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Linux came out much later than Windows and macOS and didn't have anywhere near as much financial backing and marketing resources as the other two.

Why did anyone think proprietary software was acceptable to begin with?
Why didn't they demand that Windows free their code?

Me on the left :3

Because nobody cares.

Tell me, how many lines of code have you altered in Linux?

FREEDOM IS RICHARD STALLMAN RAINING BLOWS DOWN UPON YOU IS FREEDOM

>Why did anyone think proprietary software was acceptable to begin with?

HI, I'M NEW
ENTERING ANY NUMBER DISVISBLE BY 7 ACTIVATES WINDOWS 95, WHICH IS FREE ENOUGH

Attached: Magical_Girl Lyrical Nanoha StrikerS 02 01.jpg (704x396, 52.19K)

You don't have to be a programmer understand why proprietary software is a bad idea. Especially when it comes to something as essential as the operating system.

*to understand

excuse the herf

explain to a normal why a programmer shouldn't get paid for software they create.

should we allow closed code? do tell.

Attached: Magical_Girl Lyrical Nanoha StrikerS 02 03.jpg (704x396, 56.61K)

>why a programmer shouldn't get paid for software they create
I never said this. There are people who get paid to develop libre software.
>should we allow closed code? do tell.
No one should pay for it. It should be boycotted.