Fedora or Debian stable?

Fedora or Debian stable?
If you had to use one which one would it be and why?

Attached: fvsd.png (612x300, 73.56K)

Other urls found in this thread:

redmondmag.com/articles/2020/02/24/nested-virtualization-windows-10-hyperv.aspx
youtube.com/watch?v=uxyGf1LfaQ8
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Fedora, because apt is broken as fuck.

debian, because dnf is slow garbage that has less packages and i hate updating

>he thinks the packages belong to the package manager

Windows 11, because I'm not gimping my PC with Troonix.

>using the most gimped version of Windows

With rpmfusion that's not really true. With some tweaks to dnf.conf it can be pretty fast. Have you ever tried packaging a .deb? It will make you want to commit sodoku.

Fedora isn't really comparable to Debian Stable.
If anything, it compares to Testing, or Debian Stable compares to RHEL or its rebuilds.

Still picking Debian.

W11 supports nested VMs. W10 doesn't. In fact W11 has a tonne more features than W10 and it's faster.
>But muh taskbar
Use Start11 retard

>W11 supports nested VMs. W10 doesn't.
Yes it does.
>W11 has a tonne more features than W10
Such as?
>and it's faster.
Proof?

I thought debian was only for servers, do people really use that outdated piece of shit on the desktop?

tinkerers get the rope, i will not install your spyware faggot

They do, you have just been clueless stupid and wrong this whole time.

There does seem to have been an influx of Debian-using zoomers this summer, such as

>Yes it does
Yes, Windows 11 does support nested VMs while Windows 10 doesn't not I'm glad you agree with me.
>spyware
>has a smartphone
Brainlet

Windows 10 supports nested VMs you dumb zoomer faggot.
redmondmag.com/articles/2020/02/24/nested-virtualization-windows-10-hyperv.aspx

ii chromium 103.0.5060.53-1 amd64 web browser
ii firefox 102.0-1 amd64 Mozilla Firefox web browser
ii libreoffice-core 1:7.3.5~rc1-1 amd64 office productivity suite -- arch-dependent files
ii linux-image-amd64 5.18.5-1 amd64 Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package)

I don't see anything outdated there, son.

Not a zoomer or even close to that. If you would have been here longer than the summer you would have seen people talking about Debian for years.

Both are really good, I use Fedora since it has better defaults

>Nested virtualization was first introduced in Windows Server 2016 and in the Windows 10 Anniversary Update. As such, you need to be running Windows Server 2016 or higher and the Windows 10 Anniversary Update or higher. The parent OS that I am using for the examples in this column is Windows Server 2019. It's also worth noting that nested virtualization is only supported on Intel processors. The server that I am using is equipped with two Intel Xeon processors.
>Didn't read his own link
I accept your concession and admission you are wrong.

I know people have been talking about Debian for years, but it's been strongly shilled by summerfags like you this year.

>third party repo
Might as well use window and download random exe at that point.

>Nested virtualization was first introduced in Windows Server 2016 and in the Windows 10 Anniversary Update
>and in the Windows 10 Anniversary Update
>Windows 10 Anniversary Update
>Windows 10
Jesus Christ you are retarded.

>he thinks everyone uses iphone
though Any Forums makes it look like homosexuals are taking over humanity, the majority are still white straight people

switched from debian to fedora and enjoy it more

Attached: 1578566309395.jpg (912x1024, 228.65K)

>It's also worth noting that nested virtualization is only supported on Intel processors
I still accept your concession

What the fuck does that have to do with Windows 11, faggot?

Only 55% of all packages outdated, no big deal.

Attached: kek.png (1149x38, 12.79K)

Have you ever used apt ? or dnf ?
yes, both are not optimal but apt still stands miles ahead of dnf. It's a pretty known fact that dnf is pretty shit

Yes, I've used both, and prefer dnf. However, these days, I use pacman.

Nested virtualization works on AMD in W11.
I still accept your concession and umad because you lost the argument.

Yes, and it's a pretty good experience when on it. The bloat with pre installed de and the shitty download design makes the installation kinda shit tho
Just use debian testing, flatpaks, or snaps if you really need to.

>Just use debian testing
Cope

Fedora was genuinly the worst experience with linux I've had and I'm not the only one
Nvidia drivers package doesnt blacklist nouvau by default
rpm, dnf or whatever the fuck is buttcheeks slow if you dont put on some shit to a config file
terrible installer, confusing layout
Literally one of the default apps was broken when i installed it, gnome store by reference. For a distribution shilled as "stable rolling release" I've had the most broken packages on it
fedora flatpak repositories (nuff said)
use mint if you want something that just works... or even better, lmde. I can't tell why people shill that shit so hard
"New packages" - placebo no one gives a shit

fedora if brand new fancy hardware, debian otherwise

Yeah pacman is pretty fast, but how exaclty is dnf better ? I'm currently using fedora after switching from devuan and man, the package management really sucks. I'm genuinely curious as how do you find/make it good.

>here is an easy and legit solution to your problem
>cope

Is this how zoomers cope? Your original post said absolutely nothing about nested virtualization not working on Windows 10 on AMD.
Not only that, but it has since been introduced to Windows 10: youtube.com/watch?v=uxyGf1LfaQ8
Cope, summerfaggot.

deltarpm automatically makes dnf better than apt

>just use the testing repo!
>still 27% out of date

Attached: you.png (1146x34, 12.83K)

fedora ws (or openSUSE tumbleweed) for daily desktop. debian for the rest.

Attached: badforyou.jpg (750x1000, 74.09K)

For a fair comparison, now post business trusted, way-too-expensive RHEL.