I guess C++ really is the only option for cross platform GUIs that aren't Electron or Microsoft. Why the FUCK does every other language not care about this stuff?
I guess C++ really is the only option for cross platform GUIs that aren't Electron or Microsoft...
Other urls found in this thread:
gtk-rs.org
github.com
twitter.com
use c# + avalonia
The only one still using c++ for gui are those who fap themselves thinking of cucking their own mother
There are other options, they just suck equally hard.
There are "I can't believe it's not electron" GUIs like Tauri.
There is Java GUIs, like Swing. Jetbrains IDEs are the only ones on it that do not look competely shit with it and you're forced to become a java sir.
And there's Tk, it's simply C. Ugly as hell, but Python has bindings for it in-built.
Just do a web UI on top of an embedded HTTP server and save yourself the headache.
GUI development is a bitch.
What's wrong with C++?
gtk-rs.org
Drop your autism.
Avalonia XAML editor is not available for linux unless you pay for Rider.
>can't split a string
Not meant for userspace apps.
"abc" | split('b')
It just looks weird because they overdosed on FP.
Pascal™
JavaFX™
>gtk-rs.org
this, or if you enjoy functional programming, you may also look at the Haskell Gtk bindings
Did gcc or clang implement ranges yet
well its not like theres more options for the desktop other than C++, C#, golang and rust
Golang has one but is very bared boned
theres wrappers for rust but every port for rust is some halfassed shit. Pisses me off. Either do it right or dont do it at all and possibly waste somebody's time.
>he doesnt have his own bespoke StringUtils library
Ngmi
poor nazrin
ATAMA WARU WARU~
Free pascal
>>can't split a string
if you're a programmer then you can make it split a string
just reinvent your own wheel bro
what's the point of your cope exactly?
you're totally making something new and not just copying what already exists anyway, right?
>The only one still using c++ for gui are those who fap themselves thinking of cucking their own mother
What does that even mean?
The only cope I see is
>the cope is implication that writing a for loop is not hard for any relevant programmer
Yes.
then Haskell will be like the perfect language for writing your next killer app
Ok